From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8924 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2010 14:41:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8911 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2010 14:41:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:40:58 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1481454qyk.0 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.191.147 with SMTP id dm19mr2429493qcb.33.1284648056236; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.231.206 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:40:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7d77a27d0910111921v13a8e8acpb98c29a9aa72ed8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1255182393-15292-1-git-send-email-freephp@gmail.com> <4AD28E95.1050404@vmware.com> <7d77a27d0910111921v13a8e8acpb98c29a9aa72ed8@mail.gmail.com> From: Jiang Jilin Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rewrite the codes for opcode 0x0f01 and add more instructions support To: Michael Snyder Cc: Hui Zhu , gdb-patches ml , "tromey@redhat.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm very sorry due to my work, however, it's good news that the I've finished the paper assignment. Should I rewrite the patch again? Any comments are welcome! Thank you! On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jiang Jilin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Michael Snyder wro= te: >> Jiang Jilin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, guys >>> >>> I've rewrite the codes for opcode 0x0f01 with more readable, add >>> xgetbv/xsetbv/rdtscp/vmcall/vmlaunch/vmresume/vmxoff instructions >>> support as well. >>> >>> However, I'm *not* sure it's whether right or not, especially with >>> the new supported instructions beginning with "vm". And I remove all >>> codes to save EFLAGS register which is not specified to be saved by >>> Intel's manual, so please help me review them. >>> >>> Luckily, there is no regression when using precord.exp board file to te= st. >>> >>> At last but not least, there is some differences in gdb.sum when >>> 'make check' before and after applying this patch. I cannot make >>> a decision whether it's correct, so please help me. The diff are >>> as follows: >> >> Ah well, but you see, now the change is too big to be accepted >> without a copyright assignment. =A0Do you want to start the process >> of filing one? > > I've done as Joel told me, now I just wait for the paper arrival. > > Anyway, thank you! :) > >> [Cc: Tom Tromey] >> > -- > Jiang > --=20 Jiang