From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74759-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15718 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2010 16:32:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 15710 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2010 16:32:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ,TW_JC,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:32:02 +0000
Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o75GW0tJ031292	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:32:00 -0700
Received: from vws8 (vws8.prod.google.com [10.241.21.136])	by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o75GVxeQ005607	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:31:59 -0700
Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so7435488vws.2        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.126.130 with SMTP id c2mr7531853vcs.25.1281025918853; Thu, 	05 Aug 2010 09:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.179.205 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3r5idvx8d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <m3aaqcqhgn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m339vs36lj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3r5ik4s15.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<AANLkTin0GfPdMACxbg_PfNs_haMwjKr1P391mm6Kuaj5@mail.gmail.com>	<m3r5idvx8d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhHWde0=EVrNeyCLb4iyDgT_5KWvfQUALZB-fi@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [0/4] RFC: add DWARF index support
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> What happens if gdb exits with a non-zero exit code but still happens
> Doug> to leave a .gdb-index for the `if' to find?
>
> I don't think this can happen.

... assuming there are no bugs.

> Doug> What happens if objcopy exits with a non-zero exit code?
> Doug> What happens if the script is invoked with none or too many arguments?
>
> I will fix these up.

Thanks.