From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23980 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2010 01:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23971 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2010 01:15:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:15:42 +0000 Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so3698708wwb.12 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.4.19 with SMTP id 19mr1625419wei.110.1282958139287; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:15:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.205 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:15:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100827155832.GB2986@adacore.com> References: <83fx039kel.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6c1prnh.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbilnv4n.fsf@gnu.org> <8339u3ordt.fsf@gnu.org> <20100827143946.GA2986@adacore.com> <8339u0m4vu.fsf@gnu.org> <20100827155832.GB2986@adacore.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA/DOC] record pic To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 Hi guys, I am so sorry that this patch affect the release too much. If you don't mind, I suggest it delay until after 7.2 release. Thanks, Hui On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 23:58, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I'm sorry, but the last version is still far from even being >> less-than-perfect. =A0I cannot in good faith let users read such >> documentation. =A0And what if the FSF decides to print this version of >> the manual and sell it as a book? > > Hmm, that's a good point :-(. Well, we'll just have to be patient. > > BTW: Just to make it clear, this was not an appreciation of your > reviewing work; I think you're doing a great job helping everyone > with their documentation patch. It's just that in this particular > case, with distance and English issues, the process is very slow > and there is nothing much we can do about it (hence the not-so-good > suggestion). Like Andrew used to say: Everything takes a week on > the internet. > > -- > Joel >