public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sim: riscv: Fix some issues with class-a instructions
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:30:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8P193MB1285976A1D020387894AC5F2E4112@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)

This fixes some issues with atomic instruction handling.  First the
instructions may have AQ and/or RL bits set, but the emulator has no
such concept, so we have to ignore those.

According to the spec the memory must be naturally aligned, otherwise
an exception shall be thrown, so do the sim_core read/write aligned.
In the case of riscv64 target, there were the LR_D and SC_D
64bit load and store instructions missing, so add those.

Also the AMOMIN/AMOMAX[U]_W instructions were not correct for riscv64
because the upper half word of the input registers were not ignored
as they should, so use explicit type-casts to uint32_t and int32_t
for those.

And finally make the class-a instruction set only executable if a
riscv cpu model with A extension is selected.
---
 sim/riscv/sim-main.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

v2: use sim_core_read/write_unaligned, but override current_alignment,
to raise an exception when the address is not aligned.

diff --git a/sim/riscv/sim-main.c b/sim/riscv/sim-main.c
index e4b15b533ba..0c05b79dea4 100644
--- a/sim/riscv/sim-main.c
+++ b/sim/riscv/sim-main.c
@@ -841,6 +841,9 @@ execute_m (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
 static sim_cia
 execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
 {
+  unsigned_word mask_aq = OP_MASK_AQ << OP_SH_AQ;
+  unsigned_word mask_rl = OP_MASK_RL << OP_SH_RL;
+  unsigned_word mask_aqrl = mask_aq | mask_rl;
   struct riscv_sim_cpu *riscv_cpu = RISCV_SIM_CPU (cpu);
   SIM_DESC sd = CPU_STATE (cpu);
   struct riscv_sim_state *state = RISCV_SIM_STATE (sd);
@@ -853,15 +856,24 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
   struct atomic_mem_reserved_list *amo_prev, *amo_curr;
   unsigned_word tmp;
   sim_cia pc = riscv_cpu->pc + 4;
+  int prev_alignment = current_alignment;
+
+  if (current_alignment != FORCED_ALIGNMENT)
+    current_alignment = STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
 
   /* Handle these two load/store operations specifically.  */
-  switch (op->match)
+  switch (op->match & ~mask_aqrl)
     {
+    case MATCH_LR_D:
     case MATCH_LR_W:
       TRACE_INSN (cpu, "%s %s, (%s);", op->name, rd_name, rs1_name);
-      store_rd (cpu, rd,
-	sim_core_read_unaligned_4 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, read_map,
-				   riscv_cpu->regs[rs1]));
+      if (op->xlen_requirement == 64)
+	tmp = sim_core_read_unaligned_8 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, read_map,
+					 riscv_cpu->regs[rs1]);
+      else
+	tmp = EXTEND32 (sim_core_read_unaligned_4 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, read_map,
+						   riscv_cpu->regs[rs1]));
+      store_rd (cpu, rd, tmp);
 
       /* Walk the reservation list to find an existing match.  */
       amo_curr = state->amo_reserved_list;
@@ -878,6 +890,7 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
       amo_curr->next = state->amo_reserved_list;
       state->amo_reserved_list = amo_curr;
       goto done;
+    case MATCH_SC_D:
     case MATCH_SC_W:
       TRACE_INSN (cpu, "%s %s, %s, (%s);", op->name, rd_name, rs2_name,
 		  rs1_name);
@@ -889,9 +902,14 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
 	  if (amo_curr->addr == riscv_cpu->regs[rs1])
 	    {
 	      /* We found a reservation, so operate it.  */
-	      sim_core_write_unaligned_4 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, write_map,
-					  riscv_cpu->regs[rs1],
-					  riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+	      if (op->xlen_requirement == 64)
+		sim_core_write_unaligned_8 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, write_map,
+					    riscv_cpu->regs[rs1],
+					    riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+	      else
+		sim_core_write_unaligned_4 (cpu, riscv_cpu->pc, write_map,
+					    riscv_cpu->regs[rs1],
+					    riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
 	      store_rd (cpu, rd, 0);
 	      if (amo_curr == state->amo_reserved_list)
 		state->amo_reserved_list = amo_curr->next;
@@ -920,7 +938,7 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
 					       riscv_cpu->regs[rs1]));
   store_rd (cpu, rd, tmp);
 
-  switch (op->match)
+  switch (op->match & ~mask_aqrl)
     {
     case MATCH_AMOADD_D:
     case MATCH_AMOADD_W:
@@ -931,25 +949,37 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
       tmp = riscv_cpu->regs[rd] & riscv_cpu->regs[rs2];
       break;
     case MATCH_AMOMAX_D:
-    case MATCH_AMOMAX_W:
       tmp = max ((signed_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
 		 (signed_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
       break;
+    case MATCH_AMOMAX_W:
+      tmp = max ((int32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
+		 (int32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+      break;
     case MATCH_AMOMAXU_D:
-    case MATCH_AMOMAXU_W:
       tmp = max ((unsigned_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
 		 (unsigned_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
       break;
+    case MATCH_AMOMAXU_W:
+      tmp = max ((uint32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
+		 (uint32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+      break;
     case MATCH_AMOMIN_D:
-    case MATCH_AMOMIN_W:
       tmp = min ((signed_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
 		 (signed_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
       break;
+    case MATCH_AMOMIN_W:
+      tmp = min ((int32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
+		 (int32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+      break;
     case MATCH_AMOMINU_D:
-    case MATCH_AMOMINU_W:
       tmp = min ((unsigned_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
 		 (unsigned_word) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
       break;
+    case MATCH_AMOMINU_W:
+      tmp = min ((uint32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rd],
+		 (uint32_t) riscv_cpu->regs[rs2]);
+      break;
     case MATCH_AMOOR_D:
     case MATCH_AMOOR_W:
       tmp = riscv_cpu->regs[rd] | riscv_cpu->regs[rs2];
@@ -975,6 +1005,7 @@ execute_a (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
 				riscv_cpu->regs[rs1], tmp);
 
  done:
+  current_alignment = prev_alignment;
   return pc;
 }
 
@@ -1307,7 +1338,15 @@ execute_one (SIM_CPU *cpu, unsigned_word iw, const struct riscv_opcode *op)
   switch (op->insn_class)
     {
     case INSN_CLASS_A:
-      return execute_a (cpu, iw, op);
+      /* Check whether model with A extension is selected.  */
+      if (riscv_cpu->csr.misa & 1)
+	return execute_a (cpu, iw, op);
+      else
+	{
+	  TRACE_INSN (cpu, "UNHANDLED EXTENSION: %d", op->insn_class);
+	  sim_engine_halt (sd, cpu, NULL, riscv_cpu->pc, sim_signalled,
+			   SIM_SIGILL);
+	}
     case INSN_CLASS_C:
       /* Check whether model with C extension is selected.  */
       if (riscv_cpu->csr.misa & 4)
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-23 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-23 14:30 Bernd Edlinger [this message]
2024-04-25 13:15 ` Bernd Edlinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AS8P193MB1285976A1D020387894AC5F2E4112@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).