public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zhiyong" <Zhiyong.Yan@windriver.com>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: "tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [patch] gdbserver assert error on arm platform
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 01:50:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL3PR11MB6434386B886ADBCF4472559DE75FA@BL3PR11MB6434.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511062001.2745878-1-zhiyong.yan@windriver.com>

Hi,
    Did this patch get a chance of review ?

Thanks!
Zhiyong



-----Original Message-----
From: zhiyong.yan@windriver.com <zhiyong.yan@windriver.com> 
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:20 PM
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: tom@tromey.com; Yan, Zhiyong <Zhiyong.Yan@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [patch] gdbserver assert error on arm platform

From: Zhiyong Yan <zhiyong.yan@windriver.com>

Bugzilla 30387 has given the steps of producing this issue on arm platform.
Gdb should not assume pending threads always generate “a non-gdbserver trap event”, a “Signal 17” event could happen.
Now that resume_stopped_resumed_lwps() -> may_hw_step() assumes that the break point must already exist, resume_one_thread() should ensure the software breaking point is installed although the thread is pending.

LINK: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30387

Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yan zhiyong.yan@windriver.com
---
 gdbserver/linux-low.cc | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc index e6a39202a98..543daf66376 100644
--- a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
@@ -4670,8 +4670,16 @@ linux_process_target::resume_one_thread (thread_info *thread,
 
       proceed_one_lwp (thread, NULL);
     }
-  else
-    threads_debug_printf ("leaving LWP %ld stopped", lwpid_of (thread));
+  else{
+	threads_debug_printf ("leaving LWP %ld stopped", lwpid_of (thread));
+	if(thread->last_resume_kind == resume_step){
+	    /*
+	    * If resume_step is required by GDB, install single-step breakpoint.
+	    */
+	    if (supports_software_single_step())
+	       install_software_single_step_breakpoints (lwp);
+	}
+  }
 
   thread->last_status.set_ignore ();
   lwp->resume = NULL;
--
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-19  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11  6:20 zhiyong.yan
2023-05-11 21:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2023-06-19  1:50 ` Yan, Zhiyong [this message]
2023-06-20  7:35   ` Bruno Larsen
2023-06-20  8:08     ` Yan, Zhiyong
2023-06-22  1:44       ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BL3PR11MB6434386B886ADBCF4472559DE75FA@BL3PR11MB6434.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=zhiyong.yan@windriver.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).