Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove a few hurdles of compiling with clang

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/12/2017 05:23 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:
>
>>>  - gdb: Add -Wno-mismatched-tags: We already have a system that tests which
>>> warning flags are supported by the current compiler, so this flag will not
>>> be included in the builds with GCC.  So it's neutral for GCC, and improves
>>> the situation for Clang with almost no effort.
>>
>> This warning is a bug in clang and really should not be warned about
>> in either -Wall or -Wextra.  I have been complaining about this since
>> clang added this option.
>
> IIRC, the reason this warning exists is because Microsoft's compilers
> mangle "struct" and "class" differently, so for projects that
> want to be portable to that compiler, it's a helpful warning.
> (Whether that should ever be part of -Wall is a separate matter...)
>
> I don't think we'd want to bend backwards to support MSVC
> though.  It's so non-conforming that it's scary.  Disabling
> that warning is the right thing to do, IMO.

Why not have clang disable this warning by default instead?
I am sorry but people who write C++ should understand that they are the same.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>