From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28139 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 14:31:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28124 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 14:31:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lb0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f179.google.com) (209.85.217.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:30:58 +0000 Received: by lbbzr7 with SMTP id zr7so16454302lbb.1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.162.70 with SMTP id xy6mr14226930lbb.122.1437748254595; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.87.75 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55B204B8.9030101@redhat.com> References: <20150717175328.GA15874@adacore.com> <55A94617.1040701@codesourcery.com> <83r3o661z4.fsf@gnu.org> <55B204B8.9030101@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update? From: Iain Buclaw To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Luis Machado , Joel Brobecker , GDB Patches , keiths@redhat.com, Jan Kratochvil , Yunlian Jiang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00703.txt.bz2 On 24 July 2015 at 11:26, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 07/17/2015 08:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:14:47 -0300 >>> From: Luis Machado >>> CC: , Jan Kratochvil , >>> >>> Do we consider the fact that mingw32 (and maybe other non-GNU) builds >>> have been broken since this libiberty sync a blocker/critical issue? >> >> It's not broken: I've built the pretest with that problem in it, and >> it does build, albeit with a (harmless) warning. >> >>> Last we heard of it was here... >>> >>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00654.html >> >> The release tarball builds without -Werror, so this warning is just a >> warning, since asprintf does return an int. > > It's also a varargs function though; varargs functions > must have a visible prototype. I wouldn't be surprised if this > resulted in a crash/corruption on some targets/abis. > > ISTR seeing a patch for this, but I can't find it now. > > Did I just imagine it? > Do you mean: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00570.html Iain