From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130860 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2015 14:59:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130851 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2015 14:59:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ig0-f173.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f173.google.com) (209.85.213.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:59:45 +0000 Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so73381630igb.1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7CTbAO71PP/s6IQwRtkb/IDQYXAxN/my9y8KKDlM6Ao=; b=dtflqEE8Zpqk4Ndqv106VEBNKDK0eF+AbP8dk3at5OTzmM6Cs0wI9q9JK+0qF9cCsd 7mFmhi1xrYDG/Rlrruxdws0XffpdsIJN5LnqrOYuf8Xa7Tp+RUd8Wj3UCa2xlvIyBY4/ QEZrcioF5cuN5fKoUP5r0tVBrbxUpXBIC46m5g8NBhKqtjk/vbgApCMDOlE+1HkNUTfs TPyLAJYYCT7Yi6FuBl4cRG3Rnb8n/mkXNNrA2Dtm6N/CwY2LGr5UEc+KHAeCubw3PzGi P3mXrM6BpDSy3U7sjuM3C84i12jNRyFziMAPENB4F3asHt3SG3q0uhlZ/2PbCmDrfsi8 XM9A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVPEgmA2jw8avpL6p7iD96ubLp+TCyoJE46fzouG+30ZRAyAi0XGq6dtgiS8JhJYdyDxzH X-Received: by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr26973768igl.22.1436972383258; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.93.102 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150715082127.GA21338@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150621101644.GA12733@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150623204702.GA2156@host1.jankratochvil.net> <559D3749.9010200@redhat.com> <20150712190921.GA8682@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150712192911.GB12553@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83vbdp8846.fsf@gnu.org> <55A39439.1090803@redhat.com> <20150713123835.GA2529@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150715082127.GA21338@host1.jankratochvil.net> From: Doug Evans Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches , Aleksandar Ristovski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:13:26 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: >> So I'd be ok with just adding a simple note somewhere saying >> the option only applies to solibs at the moment and will >> eventually also apply to exes. > > So the option is now called 'validate-build-id'. > > Its description everywhere (NEWS+gdb.texinfo+'help set validate-build-id') > talks about shared library now. Is it OK this way or should it be changed? fine by me. thanks!