public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Paul_Koning@dell.com
Cc: khooyp@cs.umd.edu, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Make the "python" command resemble the standard Python interpreter
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPb22QfoNKJr=c897GFO-RD69Lrd0HuEV2jBjanV8ZB1mb-DQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030F1EB39B@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:52 AM,  <Paul_Koning@dell.com> wrote:
>>There already is an established behaviour for python without arguments (with or without a terminal).
>>
>>(gdb) python
>> > print 1 + 2
>> > end
>>3
>>(gdb)
>>
>>I've read the thread and I don't seen anyone raising this issue (could have missed it though.  I saw Tom's message re: what output CLI will generate, but this is about behaviour).
>>I've read the patch and I don't think using from_tty is ok to select between the different behaviours.
>>
>>Can we pick a different way of invoking the python interpreter?
>
> But "python" seems rather an intuitive way of doing it.

I COMPLETELY AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
However, this changes things incompatibly ...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-12 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-11  0:31 Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11  4:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-11 10:43 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-11 10:59   ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-11 16:04   ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 17:48     ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 18:48     ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-11 19:04       ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 19:11         ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-11 21:06           ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 21:33             ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 22:22               ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-20 21:25                 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-20 21:31             ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-22 16:42               ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 20:56 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:30   ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 21:41     ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-12  3:07   ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-13 14:09   ` Phil Muldoon
2012-01-13 21:39     ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-12 16:48 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 16:52   ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-12 16:55   ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-12 17:24     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-01-12 17:30     ` Doug Evans [this message]
2012-01-12 17:38       ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-12 17:46         ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 17:48           ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 17:51             ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-12 18:06               ` Doug Evans
     [not found]                 ` <CADPb22T1ZmfiGeF9g-QZN6pCTBHwT5ByD9ddX_Dhxe4URvTAhw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-01-12 18:21                   ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-12 18:36                     ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 18:48                       ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-12 21:22                         ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 18:30                 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-21  1:56           ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-22 16:57             ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-23 22:17               ` Doug Evans
2012-01-24 17:36                 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-26 18:28                   ` Doug Evans
2012-01-30  6:50                     ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-30 17:25                       ` Doug Evans
2012-01-30 19:57                         ` Doug Evans
2012-02-06 20:08                           ` Doug Evans
2012-02-06 20:13                             ` Paul_Koning
2012-02-06 20:30                               ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-02-06 20:34                               ` Doug Evans
2012-02-06 20:59                                 ` Paul_Koning
2012-02-06 21:54                           ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADPb22QfoNKJr=c897GFO-RD69Lrd0HuEV2jBjanV8ZB1mb-DQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dje@google.com \
    --cc=Paul_Koning@dell.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=khooyp@cs.umd.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).