public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix implptr-optimized-out.exp fail in thumb mode
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPb22RGCXiYA1KfjfDTY0pMcmALYJrXG+OE23jdfxUqNMUU4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411951921-16168-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I see the fail in gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp in thumb mode
>
> (gdb) p p->f^M
> No symbol "p" in current context.^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp: p p->f
>
> In thumb mode, the lsb of references to 'main' in the assembly
> (produced by dwarf assember) is set, so the generated debug
> information is incorrect.
>
> in this patch, we add a label main_label inside function main.  Linker
> doesn't set its lsb in thumb mode, and we can get function main's
> address by 'main_label - $main_label_offset'.
>
> gdb/testsuite:
>
> 2014-09-29  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>
>
>         * gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp: Compile main.c to object.
>         Calculate the offset of main_label to main.  Compile the generated
>         asm file and link the executable.
>         (Dwarf::assemble): Get address of main by
>         main_label - $main_label_offset.
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp
> index 649f52d..534bed0 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/implptr-optimized-out.exp
> @@ -22,9 +22,35 @@ if {![dwarf2_support]} {
>  standard_testfile main.c .S
>  set executable ${testfile}
>
> +if  {[gdb_compile ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile} ${binfile}1.o \
> +         object {}] != ""} {
> +    return -1
> +}
> +# Start GDB and load object file, compute the offset from main to
> +# main_label which are needed in the Dwarf Assembler below.
> +clean_restart ${binfile}1.o
> +
> +set main_label_offset ""
> +set test "p main_label - main"
> +gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
> +    -re ".* = ($decimal)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
> +       set main_label_offset $expect_out(1,string)
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +if { $main_label_offset == "" } {
> +    # Bail out here, because we can't do the following tests if
> +    # $main_label_offset is unknown.
> +    return -1
> +}
> +
> +gdb_exit
> +
>  # Create the DWARF.
>  set asm_file [standard_output_file $srcfile2]
>  Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
> +    global main_label_offset
> +
>      cu { version 3 } {
>         compile_unit {
>             {producer "GNU C 4.4.3"}
> @@ -52,8 +78,8 @@ Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
>
>             subprogram {
>                 {name main}
> -               {low_pc main addr}
> -               {high_pc main+0x100 addr}
> +               {low_pc "main_label - $main_label_offset" addr}
> +               {high_pc "main_label - $main_label_offset + 0x100" addr}
>                 {type :$int_label}
>                 {external 1 flag}
>             } {
> @@ -80,10 +106,17 @@ Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
>      }
>  }
>
> -if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp $executable "${asm_file} ${srcfile}" {}] {
> +if  {[gdb_compile $asm_file ${binfile}0.o object {}] != ""} {
>      return -1
>  }
>
> +if  {[gdb_compile [list ${binfile}0.o ${binfile}1.o] \
> +         "${binfile}" executable {}] != ""} {
> +    return -1
> +}
> +
> +clean_restart ${testfile}
> +
>  # DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer implementation requires a valid frame.
>  if ![runto_main] {
>      return -1

Hi.

One question that comes to mind is: If this solution is going to
proliferate it would be good to convince ourselves there's no better
solution.  I'm ok with this as a one-off here and there, but I'd like
to understand how many more of these will there be.  Plus I can
imagine of course the number growing over time.
Can we, for example, enhance the dwarf assembler and provide a hook
for the thumb target to use to fix this there?

But *if* we do decide there's no better solution, there's a lot of
boilerplate here.
Can we tuck it away in a utility?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-08 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-29  0:56 [PATCH 0/2] " Yao Qi
2014-09-29  0:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] Use Dwarf::assemble in implptr-optimized-out.exp Yao Qi
2014-09-29  0:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Fix implptr-optimized-out.exp fail in thumb mode Yao Qi
2014-10-07 15:35   ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-08 11:43     ` Yao Qi
2014-10-08 15:32   ` Doug Evans [this message]
2014-10-09 12:43     ` Yao Qi
2014-10-07 14:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADPb22RGCXiYA1KfjfDTY0pMcmALYJrXG+OE23jdfxUqNMUU4A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).