From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10367 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2015 18:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10264 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 18:50:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f50.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f50.google.com) (209.85.218.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:50:42 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h136so50860753oig.9 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sxmTZ+B80NG/z6mkTZBtdLDbqoyZ42uXD4lkNWEv9hw=; b=SGdiKhvPL1scU0zAuV7XEfYvhn3Fgsf8P9BVS3voDBOlSWMsBMfUb8EwOAeJYlmnB5 7A1SOwLdhJnMY0jSKQh/GabszOI/IvJ2vZ2rmn6IX3Va8a6hEwNWnQ2zck45PeId3Jp6 mCREdcaTseLin+lg3ihiVXAJcaNeqqZz59cbA8OumZHgcEzyiyVHqVclYpkrD0c15SKr k4vU1Gf0Nv4E3tVgbIczZbkYJ8bFMkWJiajAdUDZBFZE3IZYWmYWEn6yNY1GUx2d6O88 ZpMrv2ZLmFOsiKgfDPDG6Zayumodvrf0k/mteymAz81aMDC2qA7anuc1tOWN4n23p15M I2pg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbrUmd6ulEZ+Exb2gR0WnodAEyB65z0agajhN47alrhLjnTv606h8hhnSI0sBUzlkqnZ1o MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.91.138 with SMTP id p132mr15753730oib.47.1422989441068; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.222.98 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:50:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150116224234.GA6176@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150116224234.GA6176@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch+7.9] compile: Filter out -fpreprocessed From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > [...] > It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post a gcc > patch for it. Hi. I wasn't aware there are now rules for what can and cannot go in DW_AT_producer. DW_AT_producer has gone from being informational to having a formal spec (in the sense that something will break if, for example, a particular option is mentioned). Is this spec written down somewhere? [At least guidelines for what things may lead to breakage?]