From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19560 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2018 20:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19551 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2018 20:22:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=jim X-HELO: mail-vk1-f193.google.com Received: from mail-vk1-f193.google.com (HELO mail-vk1-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:22:08 +0000 Received: by mail-vk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id l123-v6so894995vkl.12 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:22:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ju1m0dQDWpnHvzdq4ZmGt0ImlXaWiJU+S7a2va+UZDc=; b=JlzHSWP31GYF94ngeHwYx7v5oBMsLbwe+aiE0bDjoxBjD8l/TH/NbLN20EQXYPiJ45 sZ236FmwEXMtGZ5K/47lk9lBZTtrK1pkzKpGL/wss+bZji7wFN1vm1x1F1WMRKnSU5ya cpiIZZTAp0wE2qgrjiRKUWPur4fs2iWX9A0cvNhgx1EMfqwq3iBqVEKBzL/Aq6QbSWhv fFjsKmFQCzybIu4SzxncOPjv0G38IKZOCJci01gcffWZ6ZzBS1amQSXpAwrmShBHOpza uGWRAohe1vAT2LNXjv/OJoQnNANQkwMAt1hAtlHfUUNNtcgzOK/xqrEoQDWuAei1s/Uj o8/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180924205151.22217-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20180924205151.22217-5-jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: From: Jim Wilson Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add native target for FreeBSD/riscv. To: simon.marchi@ericsson.com Cc: John Baldwin , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Andrew Burgess Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00879.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:04 PM Simon Marchi wrote: > > --- a/gdb/NEWS > > +++ b/gdb/NEWS > > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ thread apply [all | COUNT | -COUNT] [FLAG]... COMMAND > > * New native configurations > > > > GNU/Linux/RISC-V riscv*-*-linux* > > +FreeBSD/riscv riscv*-*-freebsd* > > I just noticed that we write RISC-V in two different ways for GNU/Linux and > FreeBSD: RISC-V and riscv. It's not a big deal, but it looks a bit inconsistent. > > Otherwise everything looks good to me, but again I think the RISC-V ninjas should take a look. RISC-V is the official spelling of the architecture name, and riscv is what we use for configure triplets. I try to use the official spelling whenever possible which is why I used RISC-V here. Jim