From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-151762-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6051 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2018 21:21:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 6029 invoked by uid 89); 22 Oct 2018 21:21:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-vs1-f65.google.com
Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com (HELO mail-vs1-f65.google.com) (209.85.217.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:21:49 +0000
Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a202so30587854vsd.5        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=sifive.com; s=google;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=lLSfrG3iuIoOfMDgLZK8+9thfLDLyDopnvHQ/1C17p0=;        b=AiDMXpiDmZll7vIu2bKV1aQ99OEVZlEBajf4D4LPqEVMxXu61UbbTBWjZ+02cux6V1         Me+BM53SbqauTNAqaIJhsr9Ip53CVJZFsoWg727LhG/QtgHwlk0BC31RGoitddR/q3mq         iILGCW+AQFnBgm9Ang2GU/4NMcFSh4So9OIizE+3bUht0/Xiwsu38PaRdlzQ1kmMC841         INUaDS+079zfUTVgaUHqMe3IVxCnEGGsC2FkaIcl4DoXlyKZmqAQ6akxnPTadJMLixAe         a/MienK2BRj+uBf1Cg+NCLvv5/9YkAhniBwmy3ZdkvqfxoQ8eL+c6zLCvUXDh/hb6xw5         ua9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFyWVabswzH+cwN6aBgPbP-ccUjUC2iya+HUyLjYzxLgUaM_Zg@mail.gmail.com> <20181019214953.9010-1-jimw@sifive.com> <20181020143947.0bdcf4ae@pinnacle.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20181020143947.0bdcf4ae@pinnacle.lan>
From: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFyWVaZhZorp1eSOfowoW37aMTdxo5qW-qj7X_F51_sh2DKcMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: NaN-box FP values smaller than an FP register.
To: kevinb@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:39 PM Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:49:53 -0700
> Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> > The hardware requires that values in FP registers be NaN-boxed, so we must
> > extend them with 1's instead of 0's as we do for integer values.
> >
> >       gdb/
> >       * riscv-tdep.c (riscv_push_dummy_call) <in_reg>: Check for value in
> >       FP reg smaller than FP reg size, and fill with -1 instead of 0.
>
> Okay.

Committed.

Jim