From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Edjunior Machado <emachado@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [BuildBot] Notifications disabled for Debian-s390x-* and Fedora-ppc64*-* builders
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvny=RyKfXdMXuzZphGfS7_mYN0+gsausbK-VRx0--V4F+DQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnykFSC9v4hJ_stndpak=yNzPqnDfwYHgoRbmzP7_kUJQbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:29 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 12/15/2017 03:53 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/15/2017 03:06 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Third, the testsuite summaries that no one from the GDB community
>>>>> monitored show that the testsuite runtime jumped from a relatively
>>>>> short amount of time to over 9 hours for each run, which points to a
>>>>> newly introduced problem in GDB or in the testsuite (timeouts?).
>>>>
>>>> That may well be. Can you point at some representative builds,
>>>> before/after the jump?
>>>
>>> The testsuite runs for 6 minutes on RHEL7 s390x buildslave and 9 hours
>>> on Debian Jessie s390x buildslave.
>>
>> Those are separate machines. I'd like to see the jump on the same
>> machine, so we can maybe pinpoint what caused it.
>>
>> I was really asking for URLs. Here looks like there's some:
>>
>> https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Debian-s390x-native-gdbserver-m64
>>
>> Here, for example:
>>
>> https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Debian-s390x-native-gdbserver-m64/builds/4351
>>
>> "test gdb tested GDB failed (9 hrs, 2 mins, 56 secs)"
>>
>> That's definitely too long.
>>
>> I downloaded the gdb.log file, and did:
>>
>> $ grep FAIL gdb.log | grep timeout | sed 's/.exp.*/.exp/g' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
>> 1 FAIL: gdb.base/watch-cond.exp
>> 1 FAIL: gdb.multi/watchpoint-multi-exit.exp
>> 1 FAIL: gdb.threads/interrupted-hand-call.exp
>> 1 FAIL: gdb.threads/thread-unwindonsignal.exp
>> 2 FAIL: gdb.base/value-double-free.exp
>> 3 FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-async.exp
>> 3 FAIL: gdb.threads/process-dies-while-detaching.exp
>> 4 FAIL: gdb.base/pr11022.exp
>> 10 FAIL: gdb.base/watch-bitfields.exp
>> 15 FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoints.exp
>> 20 FAIL: gdb.threads/interrupt-while-step-over.exp
>> 32 FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp
>> 45 FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp
>> 46 FAIL: gdb.base/display.exp
>> 51 FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint.exp
>>
>> Not _that_ many. Could they explain the long time? I suspect not.
>>
>> We see this:
>>
>> $ grep "Test run by" gdb.log | head -n 3
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:23:01 2017
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:23:01 2017
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:23:01 2017
>>
>> $ grep "Test run by" gdb.log | tail -n 3
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:29:54 2017
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:29:54 2017
>> Test run by dje on Tue Nov 21 03:29:54 2017
>>
>> So most of the testsuite actually ran for 7 minutes. And then
>> something hung for 9 hours? I have no idea how that
>> could happen from the existing logs. The tail end of the log has:
>>
>> ~~~
>> FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint.exp: delete all breakpoints in delete_breakpoints (timeout)
>> ERROR: breakpoints not deleted
>> ERROR: breakpoints not deleted
>>
>> command timed out: 1200 seconds without output running ['make', '-k', 'check', 'RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board native-gdbserver', '-j8', 'FORCE_PARALLEL=1'], attempting to kill
>> process killed by signal 9
>> program finished with exit code -1
>> elapsedTime=32576.210392
>> ~~~
>>
>> I don't understand how 7 minutes plus 1200 seconds (~20min)
>> resulted in "elapsedTime=32576.210392" (~9h). Maybe that number
>> isn't to be trusted.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm sorry, but I really don't have the time to be
>> looking at this. Someone with the motivation and access to
>> the machine could try running the testsuite manually,
>> for example, see how long that takes, and where the hang is.
>
> I will try reverting to an older version of DejaGNU framework.
Older DejaGNU does not seem to have an effect. All of the processes
are stuck in "gdb.threads/process-dies-while-handling-bp"
Thanks, David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-15 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-15 13:45 Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15 13:54 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 14:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15 14:34 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 14:48 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-15 15:06 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 15:43 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-15 15:53 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 16:20 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-15 17:29 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 18:55 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2017-12-15 19:20 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-15 23:20 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-18 19:21 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-12-15 14:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-15 21:19 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-15 22:40 ` David Edelsohn
2017-12-15 23:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-19 10:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-12-19 11:15 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-15 22:29 ` [BuildBot] Notifications re-enabled for the Debian-s390x-* builders (was: Re: [BuildBot] Notifications disabled for Debian-s390x-* and Fedora-ppc64*-* builders) Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGWvny=RyKfXdMXuzZphGfS7_mYN0+gsausbK-VRx0--V4F+DQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=emachado@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).