From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-104589-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3429 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2013 15:14:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 3407 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2013 15:14:26 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:14:25 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m17so538616vca.3        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.145.132 with SMTP id d4mr94597vcv.9.1377270863832; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.53.132 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130823133415.GD5221@adacore.com>
References: <CAGWvnynVeLt6F-QREsP_CtQvwvtZgwqHxtcS6pn58LMf=AX=GA@mail.gmail.com>	<OF91B6D42F.B0CFCB9C-ON65257BC5.004284AA-65257BC5.0042F553@in.ibm.com>	<CAGWvnynzsNL--qPhHOhqZ912A4M9ZpXtT2JbjW4EHRodEXAF9Q@mail.gmail.com>	<20130822233234.GA13292@adacore.com>	<20130823004837.GC5221@adacore.com>	<CAGWvnymjyCc9vFbh4+eNdr2mdxJYU0=LFC1-itC38SDKfRaG-w@mail.gmail.com>	<20130823133415.GD5221@adacore.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnyna5R2AR0imAC4W+aCJXPFjwPm+45yP9VOgkO68T7sF7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage (was: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.")
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, 	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:

>> Is there a testcase that can be added to the GDB testsuite to catch
>> this type of regression?
>
> All testcases involving thread support should reveal this type of
> failure. I cannot remember exactly how this patch was tested, but
> ISTR that it couldn't be tested through the official testsuite,
> for some reasons that were deemed reasonable...

Uli and I both asked Raunaq if the patch had been tested with the
testsuite. However, the testsuite may not have been run with the full
matrix: GDB32 -> Testsuite32, GDB32 ->Testsuite64, GDB64 ->
Testsuite32, GDB64 -> Testsuite64.

- David