From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17382 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2014 18:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17373 invoked by uid 89); 11 Sep 2014 18:35:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f47.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:35:26 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a141so11464060oig.34 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=I/b4KV+7y/h+cHeGOJsCnd19jD1CTFbfjGkFHuzWbVg=; b=f1IIa/JRKYdqIfpG/fT3vHacrYgB6UjJLdlOnQc/qihXP7D3MTt9c/49yQsDQ5wE77 6LYIbkyOoJerhHQXAEOa5+dty5UFwBt7jMRDHh0ksu+1LwfbGdtkT/HX9jG9htcoKFqp 5o/1eusbSaJRl3TPyUTQNPByIu1+LIxzVexfpJ+q+yRvvFziebXYXYw7ROchZXBugZQ7 a+qcm51+gGlA5yV8jObCDyP85HisfC1scVI6z24EtE6gCFLmDJJUEHmjQcetKyeLSs/B 5Pk2GukCJRr4fLCu2pg9HmQ+guCoQXtNtNMOasZja1jeJ7go/NwG6gKEBedhKkz0XZie +qQg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDPAIlOsqBkyKdgq/Yvukenl9X2XcyylGcIiXaEA1R5QAKujBo4DKFXjWXuIN1ZGYEtsVF MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.63.201 with SMTP id i9mr3160967oes.52.1410460524246; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.225.135 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH 0/4] PR c++/13403 and PR c++/15154: Fix function calling convention in gnuv3 ABI From: Siva Chandra To: gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 This patch series addresses the two listed PRs. The gnuv3 ABI function which decides whether a class value has to be passed by reference (or, returned in a hidden first parameter) is currently incomplete. This patch series completes it. The way I have organised my patches is that: - Patch 1/4 adds tests which illustrate what is missing. One test fails, another passes. - Patch 2/4 fixes the ABI to address the failing the test in 1/4. - Patch 3/4 adds another failing test. - Patch 4/4 fixes the ABI to address the failing test in 3/4. If the patches go in in the same order as above, then the tree will have one new failing test after 1/4 lands but before 2/4 lands. Is that OK? If not, then I can merge 1 and 2 into one patch, and 3 and 4 into 1 patch. I have ordered it this way because I thought it might be easier for the reviewers to see what works and what doesn't currently.