From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] Call overloaded operators to perform valid Python operations on struct/class values.
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gzYoyct9VwjsTgVR0tcq_u3=abyfdSAQwssqQk09yYdZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9bCMTcTRTR7QUQqJXY5qAk28q3nABSh0DEJyMKOB65wf71jA@mail.gmail.com>
dje> smart_ptr = gdb.parse_and_eval ("my_smart_ptr");
dje> dereferenced_smart_ptr = gdb.parse_and_eval("*%V" % smart_ptr)
siva> Should work. May be the '%' syntax would not (I am not sure). But, we
siva> could consider other alternatives [Replace occurrences of $1, $2, etc
siva> for example].
siva> Is this an exhaustive solution or a cool fallback option when no other
siva> Pythonic way works
dje> Both?
dje> [Not sure I understand the question.]
I do think it is exhaustive. But, somehow [only a subjective feeling],
seems like a fallback option. For example, it makes simple things
(like, val1 + val2) more verbose and less readable. It is something
which one could fallback to if they want to do non-Python operations.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 19:28 Siva Chandra
2013-12-06 6:25 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-06 14:20 ` Siva Chandra
2013-12-11 20:18 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-11 20:17 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-16 7:48 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-16 22:24 ` Siva Chandra
2013-12-18 16:37 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-18 23:15 ` Siva Chandra
2013-12-19 14:11 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-19 17:50 ` Siva Chandra [this message]
2013-12-20 22:29 ` Siva Chandra
2013-12-21 8:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-12-30 14:40 ` Siva Chandra
2013-12-30 17:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-22 21:39 ` Siva Chandra
2014-01-25 18:45 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGyQ6gzYoyct9VwjsTgVR0tcq_u3=abyfdSAQwssqQk09yYdZA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sivachandra@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=xdje42@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).