From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33491 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2016 15:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 33482 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2016 15:14:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:473, hear X-HELO: mail-oi0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:14:34 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d132so36625323oib.2 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=28y70HmFLhkG+JKJLXDvgHmAQY0wfSu44taYJSioMfw=; b=OF3YTWM8cPci0cVi02lrxRL/ZNbRbzTKUxEJYhteb35bnFMnyI3keUuEC0P/GW4K9A i5u7DLrfHKQ+q9MBOnQFwTRf+Jo1qrYCJmIlil+w/lUQXA88TTB6zXAZXXeajvtA02Nj lZH/mwouydZSM1E7g5vS8VfqDNodJbofC68W6GwvNjrzju20THV86qwDmuWAx0jFvjq7 UZCynUtiIJjj3J6nPOBWvs2nozN3qPmr+SzU10L963dC0uV8DAhqNfGS6MZgvzLCRMGh fQUz+qOMynaZ0P3fjrkxYGml9a8YkbSurn8E0tL/9djmWWCtCebp6/N7BbCL4+xtWCl6 AOIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnRekl8AGf2N3qExEU3KpV6tgEZDDzRAQpcrJJqLcP/5UaJzmqYTjFI3mkZ+zbr8M5znmKzZrzOwXOL5A== X-Received: by 10.202.82.7 with SMTP id g7mr3653278oib.112.1475594072812; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:14:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.221.3 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:14:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1475531646-18049-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> References: <1475531646-18049-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> From: Yao Qi Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA 0/3] Fix various bugs found by static analysis To: Tom Tromey Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > * PR 20654, incorrect code in java_value_print. Now that gcj has been > removed, I think it's probably better to simply remove the Java > language support. If this sounds ok, let me know, and I can provide > a patch. > I am fine to remove java language support in GDB, but I'd like to hear what other people think about this. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)