From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95965 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2017 21:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95686 invoked by uid 89); 15 Dec 2017 21:19:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=bias X-HELO: mail-qk0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f171.google.com) (209.85.220.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:19:36 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h19so12015800qkj.11 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k5KAD7DiIHkQvczKD03ot0PwCopUXVF04etqxKAKzAE=; b=fAbSk/Xz6dIxnIcasH6ox52u2/6OVt5k+KGOU7LwHmaCJTb2KiKsdmhLHzYGlz3Oyr ICOyJSEwoUoBzUmgvJqRUCDV0T5/HkfxzvRpev4y0dRjmfZMrR3x7RSkfGpwZ4vGSFnu Prf9oIcueNHvN6vabOtanNWRyLSnSHDYBkBuIAt6YSWeR8F8E04xJTkHk247+t80/mBR VD9ydDbMHv23BO97elgyRmoaOfW8L2iZDvaVwIGaFFYpEOKyNDFs4dxtUmDGx25HNP0u cUV8CqgbUVWxJ/PYINztG63BEZTASC6dCni1ndnaFdlB9BGYBs/3Tebxh92vvF6UQIEx 0MQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLH3ITkWYNEfwcEd0oCYqgYMrEyUxDAuao04cG/eK8iOVrUk3Yt 62mzE/fgsJjcaQTm9bFD7EyI2vlDDZMbyIV4l58= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotA3t/u+9eDNnB2s/807j4jh2Y3uwWtAQLBaHOGBfQR5p/YCsT75xgdbCHxYf4qX+feDvy99p1eAVOPTUi5IQU= X-Received: by 10.55.126.198 with SMTP id z189mr24283839qkc.100.1513372774470; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:19:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.132.161 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:19:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87d13g6r5t.fsf@redhat.com> <878te46pk4.fsf@redhat.com> From: Yao Qi Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BuildBot] Notifications disabled for Debian-s390x-* and Fedora-ppc64*-* builders To: David Edelsohn Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , GDB Patches , Edjunior Machado Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:34 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > But the irony in your message should not be ignored. You implicitly > express that the buildbots are ignored, except possibly x86 and Try > Builds on x86, while you proceed to ask for additional participation. How do you get such implicit message? That is your bias. We still have aarch64 and aarch32 buildslaves, they are quite stable, and catches some build failures with g++ 4.8 and regressions. These builders are disabled because they are useless. Sergio asks for participation to make these builders useful. If no one wants to make these builders better, or cares about them, it is reasonable to disable them. It is equivalent to code/feature/port deprecation, if nobody maintains the code/feature/port, we'll deprecate it. > This is fundamentally inconsistent. Actions speak louder than words > and this demonstrates the priorities of the GDB community. I don't see the inconsistency here. We need more participation or contribu= tion to make these builders more useful, it is simple, isn't? --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)