From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23583858D20 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:06:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C23583858D20 Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com (mail-yb1-f199.google.com [209.85.219.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-336-AfSxlKidPN2f4BvQY75CkA-1; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:06:49 -0500 X-MC-Unique: AfSxlKidPN2f4BvQY75CkA-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id g205-20020a2552d6000000b0061e1843b8edso10372442ybb.18 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bCGLOLO8WwCb/L+iGhdjx3TEyoQ7BcP67/vksHdoWEc=; b=tbVWYyqmSwfU03Y5g6pGcX0wqizzmky4yMiedIRfSAMYcSZkEAp9FLgStrkiOYOMZB K/Tw+M+5jT+8B2taSTsYXxkwi1lMeMEth1fhoWR3HXjO09AU7j4EjfJZIPiY43tX7LpA PI+tbKQPZPfAtJGv//oQWAQi/qriV3FOuHKNrUw+4sFOYj9VuJ1Q4Hw/uQKmeSYvj1cU 4ZqsY/kxSoDNh4ib7rIhUSZ19WVth3VEF3LVmML9uVECE+8jua/FKsltdQHUysl+WyA4 YPAwalil+iINoKe06JN8aeRITUCzyIJH9nkpg0vPTiusYImzBlNYwnhBiVYrYxeZcgdM QfWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pcMC4cQ5vUPFLDVANOllZ/AuFPSaWZyrpcn+g53q8rOVqvYJF xPthHhtd84s7Dy0ZvswmV9JnYipA/g4NT7waoWn+JM1JbxXXDi75G6h8TG7ggS8c/FSL5Q2CDRr IRRF+9SDrpVO4uhEkYD7iwMusNUVZr6bfuSyO X-Received: by 2002:a81:9bc4:0:b0:2ca:287c:6c2c with SMTP id s187-20020a819bc4000000b002ca287c6c2cmr3279649ywg.209.1645114008865; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrQ/t01upzElFZjNFMNhwF3WeAZQKV7B3PecAyKr6irum5zwlNInBQClUOlOMOV7hUbMNhtPf3QzalltYbOPE= X-Received: by 2002:a81:9bc4:0:b0:2ca:287c:6c2c with SMTP id s187-20020a819bc4000000b002ca287c6c2cmr3279638ywg.209.1645114008706; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 08:06:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220126005817.56356-1-amerey@redhat.com> <20220209022548.343785-1-amerey@redhat.com> <5e6194e4-3a83-e169-0c9a-5858c993bf59@monnerat.net> In-Reply-To: <5e6194e4-3a83-e169-0c9a-5858c993bf59@monnerat.net> From: Aaron Merey Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:06:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: Improve debuginfod progress updates To: Patrick Monnerat Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:06:54 -0000 On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:38 AM Patrick Monnerat wrote: > > I've experienced at least one case where percent was > 1.0. I haven't > > been able to reproduce it because it seemed to coincide with a network > > hiccup. > Very strange! TCP is supposed to guarantee no duplicate data reception. > If this really occurs, debuginfo data are probably corrupted too! I have not seen any corrupt debuginfo acquired from debuginfod. Each time debuginfo is downloaded there is a check to make sure it has the expected build-id. The integrity of the debuginfo is also verified using the CRC in the parent file's .gnu_debuglink section. Aaron