From: Aaron Merey <amerey@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Aaron Merey via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/debuginfod: Prevent prompt for continue during downloading.
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:09:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJDtP-SPYVTk6hb8DkhhtRrUtCqCDU-dz9z2C7Svi8Dr25n=5Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a622itys.fsf@tromey.com>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 10:01 AM Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron Merey via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> Aaron> In some cases the prompt "--Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to
> Aaron> continue without paging--" can appear during a large series of
> Aaron> debuginfod downloads when lines_printed exceeds lines_allowed.
>
> Aaron> This is inconvenient plus ctrl-c during this prompt could leave some
> Aaron> of gdb's internal structures in a broken state.
>
> Aaron> Fix this by adding a bool count_lines_printed to control whether
> Aaron> lines_printed is incremented when a newline is printed. Set this
> Aaron> value to false when performing a download.
>
> There's already pagination_disabled for this. Or you can print to a
> stream other than gdb_stdout.
>
> However, my question is why pagination is even enabled at the likely
> spots where debuginfod might be called. I thought infrun generally
> disabled it.
I was able to get a prompt to show up with the command
gdb -ex 'set height 25' -ex 'start' qemu-kvm
Setting pagination_enabled to false does stop the prompt in this case,
however during testing of the on-demand downloading feature that I'm
working on [1] I saw cases where this still didn't prevent the prompt.
For example 'list main.c:50' might trigger a number of downloads where
debuginfod-related output increases lines_printed past the lines_allowed
limit. When the source lines actually print, the prompt immediately
shows up since pagination has been re-enabled and lines_allowed was
exceeded.
Adding a count_lines_printed toggle takes care of this case too.
However I didn't realise that printing to a stream besides gdb_stdout
should avoid this. I'll try to implement this fix using another stream.
Aaron
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-November/193416.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-28 4:06 Aaron Merey
2023-01-28 15:01 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-31 2:09 ` Aaron Merey [this message]
2023-01-31 14:22 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-31 20:41 ` Aaron Merey
2023-02-08 14:44 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-11 2:02 ` Aaron Merey
2023-02-13 14:17 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-13 20:23 ` Aaron Merey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJDtP-SPYVTk6hb8DkhhtRrUtCqCDU-dz9z2C7Svi8Dr25n=5Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amerey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).