From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0C03858D28 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 18:57:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6A0C03858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684954648; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xl6626nq75eizTikhK7ahniJC221sKNgmfP2WXblFm8=; b=WpyGXufbwmL20aSAcaLPRTwyzyG/60S8hwN11kxSq4mZww+kK4JbVaHQZ0tC280fHxvRRk T54Ac/ngcXTIJYlthLipBvwt0t9e1mwOMOPAOHOTSCRh450sSPvZj2ED2nZHqXtyH9ZErU fD+IKIXf2wbpKalbKm2qRhQykXNoPMs= Received: from mail-pj1-f69.google.com (mail-pj1-f69.google.com [209.85.216.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-fNoWjyFlNueDdTgdFnR-lQ-1; Wed, 24 May 2023 14:57:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fNoWjyFlNueDdTgdFnR-lQ-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2538aaa63f9so387281a91.1 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684954646; x=1687546646; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Xl6626nq75eizTikhK7ahniJC221sKNgmfP2WXblFm8=; b=jU0Cye1prIUoMW1YqCkd+N4mQr0ZK8PKGGiZmR2Ivj6ueENbsiqT9dj4xj2aojzhVQ gaSeDC6vBdw3YjM2b69+2QotJzIDvtDT4nidoqU/a8DCHihX51bs6mTCNtLquPfyEs3j z+F8HOTU5K8oRlfNNqllDhX+klrAZGUgASiHpg5E1ydNDsemBX6V19F49n8hloQjDuC7 X/5Y/uUXgfVS9cGNKwW+xO0IV4vd8UfscYb4/kwB8Ir8X+oq2Ku2DeCxa+k0vLN3qlI1 NGMaB7K7Hhf+nXfeDfZJ0H1zMcJAA6r9lySxeZHSGQbXMnaMJhtE3HAjx4DRCxDihB33 WTPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzBvrbCYIGi/gIVw5dIHh4sbKcINM6QANr3CMPYDWbe+hnWqk5o lbMrs+TJEbLcjNFvSrY4ajXRCBqMI4P7HK41BooX9z6nB2gxsco9oXTXh4p8v5eyr/dYyeZFith yjkYgSqkLhFu06kvOnk/kEliJJN3I/a71lSrk X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6341:b0:24e:44d1:18fd with SMTP id v1-20020a17090a634100b0024e44d118fdmr17303634pjs.7.1684954646139; Wed, 24 May 2023 11:57:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4ogyKFA3z3k4w9tKj63vkaDLSAI+nnpPvHmzNJk+s4JNkcJtPi+djo9u/wTg0wcoxLIjhOR5i+Vv/StTv5EFo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6341:b0:24e:44d1:18fd with SMTP id v1-20020a17090a634100b0024e44d118fdmr17303627pjs.7.1684954645860; Wed, 24 May 2023 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230227194212.348003-1-amerey@redhat.com> <20230227194212.348003-3-amerey@redhat.com> <87y1le6pdv.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87y1le6pdv.fsf@redhat.com> From: Aaron Merey Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:57:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] gdb/debuginfod: disable pagination during downloads To: Andrew Burgess Cc: Aaron Merey via Gdb-patches X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Andrew, On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:38=E2=80=AFAM Andrew Burgess wrote: > > Aaron Merey via Gdb-patches writes: > > > Disable pagination during downloads in order to avoid inconvenient > > continue prompts "--Type for more, q to quit...". > > > > For more discussion on this issue see the following thread > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-February/196674.html > > Is this patch critical to the new functionality in this series? If it's > not then you might be better spinning this patch into it's own thread. I think we can just drop this patch. If the user doesn't want pagination prompts they already have a way to disable it. Aaron