From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6547C3870855 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:25:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6547C3870855 Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id w3so3446310qkb.6 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PJyajmkMr9YNf3tOhYPrvmnhn5HS772OkCSY+dT1G5Y=; b=fnka+UHQ3wAcM5Lm1nJMFFqub5fanTXxWqe8rSWfGHBwmo5sBq1pP1SokHK4OZBGuV vqCWuNuHMLQAArIAn83Jc3a1in86N1psAXH9CFwOmbzCpp7YXSmAiVNX6bY2ZUJnmXpk BZ2RfPnqdss3Bg7eH/oQwDS5F628fm2CGvsue9akeE/Mc2pPsx0b11mW0ROs/9Tc24PZ EL3k7LZPufniHc9LHZeNlUIKGhuR/oIA7g/Wry92THPF5cbhGfqzPQcFZA0DpF3F8SbV eCv6WhJ3AYIERJYNb5KUiTC32eHI+RLQyT41iSAvRrYrgo5OyVaQaFLWb4q0RG3ARfIr sI6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zw92g3+kZpxJOiv1hQEStaMrFPn6nCDYLCAH1qMwor+V1z2XQ HC6Hn2BlwBp5SG2+5CkhmMvSnBs6vDMGxkHyvGZQlQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqtspqcL16DZ2CK67Nk3NeCzTj1ok6dFuwa2jKrusm7LzCvAPIruifvtJ4J5BIjCyloqYSmVGVM0UdwVcd6kQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6513:: with SMTP id z19mr5133343qkb.234.1591820751072; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:25:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:303a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Phi Debian Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TUI enhancement suggestion. To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:25:52 -0000 On Wednesday, June 10, 2020, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi Phi, > > It would be much better to keep the discussion on the > mailing list, so that others could interact as well. > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves > > Ok. Point line in src win along with the nice syntax highlight produce inconsistent background color as Pedro notified in the pics provided. In the example there is a strange yellow background on function names, it seems that the syntax highlight use a BOLD attribute. On basic xterm and vte, this BOLD goes unnoticed. When one use xterm resource colorBD see https://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html resource also implemented in vte, resource doing the mapping a color to the BOLD attribute (in the example yellow) it produces this background color change. Dunno if that expected. I'd like to be able to got more control (config) on how point line is displayed, in my case using underline attribute for point line would be lighter then reverse video line and would preserve (simplify) the syntax highlight. If someones as idea would be interesting to share. Cheers, Phi