public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>,
	 GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: V3 [PATCH 5/5] gnulib: Support variables from the top level Makefile
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:06:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOo9gcoyZWuiEQ5_FmSwBBxaPBt9Z0rV+1=hn4iM-cb83Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2012312348060.929441@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 3:50 PM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Work around what appears to be a GNU make bug handling MAKEFLAGS
> > values defined in terms of make variables, as is the case for CC and
> > friends when we are called from the top level Makefile.
>
> This description, and the comment in Makefile.am repeating it, is rather
> unhelpful as it provides no way for a reader to know what the supposed bug
> is.  Reviewers need to be able to work out whether the proposed workaround
> is correct or the right approach for working around the bug.  Maintainers
> in future need to be able to tell what the bug is.  So the comment needs
> to explain what the bug is and give a reference to a report for the bug in
> the GNU make bug tracker, so that subsequent maintainers can look at that
> bug to tell if the workaround is still needed at all.
>

I just copied the same workaround from other directories in GCC.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-01  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-19 18:10 V3 [PATCH 0/5] Support the PGO build for binutils+gdb H.J. Lu
2020-12-19 18:10 ` V3 [PATCH 1/5] GCC: Pass --plugin to AR and RANLIB H.J. Lu
2020-12-19 18:10 ` V3 [PATCH 2/5] Binutils: " H.J. Lu
2020-12-19 18:10 ` V3 [PATCH 3/5] Support the PGO build for binutils+gdb H.J. Lu
2021-02-28  7:01   ` Mike Frysinger
2021-02-28 12:44     ` [PATCH] Add missing changes to Makefile.tpl H.J. Lu
2020-12-19 18:10 ` V3 [PATCH 4/5] Set TESTS to gdb.dwarf2/*.exp for PGO build training H.J. Lu
2020-12-19 18:10 ` V3 [PATCH 5/5] gnulib: Support variables from the top level Makefile H.J. Lu
2020-12-31 23:50   ` Joseph Myers
2021-01-01  0:06     ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-01-05 13:26       ` Christian Biesinger
2021-01-05 14:06         ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-02 19:22 ` V3 [PATCH 0/5] Support the PGO build for binutils+gdb Segher Boessenkool
2021-01-02 19:46   ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOo9gcoyZWuiEQ5_FmSwBBxaPBt9Z0rV+1=hn4iM-cb83Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=doko@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).