From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6693 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2014 18:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6674 invoked by uid 89); 23 Dec 2014 18:26:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-ob0-f182.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:26:51 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wo20so26316859obc.13; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:26:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.198.133 with SMTP id w127mr15903535oif.74.1419359209481; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:26:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.185.7 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:26:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141223132714.GA11973@adacore.com> <20141223180802.GP12884@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Experimental branches From: "H.J. Lu" To: Cary Coutant Cc: Joel Brobecker , Binutils , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Cary Coutant wrote: >> Let's go for "user/", if people are OK with that. >> >> I'd rather not have multiple namespaces in this case, since it doesn't >> really make much of a difference to us whether it's personal or >> company-sponsored. > > Sounds good to me. > > So it'll be "user//", right? (As opposed to I prefer "user//". > "user/-" or "user/_".) And no need > to put "-branch" at the end of the branch name? I don't think "-branch" is necessary. -- H.J.