From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7585 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2014 17:42:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7562 invoked by uid 89); 23 Dec 2014 17:42:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-ob0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:42:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so26217109obc.11; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:42:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.83.34 with SMTP id n2mr17487473oey.61.1419356523286; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.185.7 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:42:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141223132714.GA11973@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Experimental branches From: "H.J. Lu" To: Cary Coutant Cc: Joel Brobecker , Binutils , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Cary Coutant wrote: >> I'd like thirdparty branches to be under a certain namespace, >> so as to be able to disable a number of features for all third-party >> branches, on of them being email notifications, bugzilla, and IRC >> notifications. >> >> So, what do people think of using "topic//"? > > Sounds good to me. At the risk of bikeshedding, "topic" sounds too > general to me -- how about "com" for company-sponsored branches (e.g., > com/google/...") and "user" for individuals (e.g., > "user/ccoutant/...")? Or "experimental"? But I'm OK with whatever you > decide. I like "user" or "users". > That ship may already have sailed, though -- there are already quite a > few personal branches, some "[-_][-_]branch", some > "/". Would it be easier to whitelist a few patterns > for branches that you *do* want those notifications for? > We can rename a branch with: # git branch -m hjl/pr17729 user/hjl/pr17729 # git push origin :hjl/pr17729 # git push -u origin user/hjl/pr17729 -- H.J.