public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
		Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	GDB <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: ping #3: [RFA] Add --with-libz-prefix option in config/zlib.m4
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqVim3=-RCuWE6GnMKoQ1v9WKaDqfaS2k8MpDz7rA_y3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218165457.GU544@vapier>

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2015 04:56, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:45:48PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> >> This patch enhances config/zlib.m4 to introduce an extra option
>> >> --with-libz-prefix which allows us to provide the location of
>> >> the zlib library we want to use during the build.
>> >>
>> >> config/ChangeLog:
>> >>
>> >>         * zlib.m4 (AM_ZLIB): Add --with-libz-prefix option support.
>> >>
>> >> I didn't see any file in the GCC project that uses this macro,
>> >> so for the GCC repository, the change to zlib.m4 is it. But
>> >> I am also attaching to this email a copy of the patch that
>> >> will be applied to the binutils-gdb.git repository, with all
>> >> configury using this macro being re-generated - mostly for info,
>> >> also as a heads-up to both binutils and GDB.
>> >>
>> >> This was tested by regenerating all autoconf/automake files in
>> >> the binutils-gdb project, and rebuilding GDB, using the following
>> >> combinations:
>> >>
>> >>   --with-zlib (system zlib used)
>> >>   --with-libz-prefix=/zlib/prefix (specific zlib linked in)
>> >>   --with-zlib --with-libz-prefix=/zlib/prefix (specific zlib linked in)
>> >>
>> >>   --without-zlib (zlib support turned off)
>> >>   --without-zlib --with-zlib-prefix (zlib support turned off)
>> >>
>> >>   --with-zlib (no system zlib available, configure fails with expected error)
>> >>   --with-zlib --with-libz-prefix=/invalid/zlib/prefix
>> >>               (no system zlib, configure fails with same error)
>> >>
>> >> OK to commit?
>>
>> Why do you want to turn off zlib? On Linux/x86,  zlib is required
>> for assembler.  At least, you should issue an error when --without-libz
>> is used in binutils for Linux/x86 target.
>
> err, when did that happen ?  why would zlib be possibly required for an
> assembler ?
> -mike

commit 89e7505fcde4bd83948f559f429a0e1eb4262f05
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 14 06:41:03 2014 -0800

    Compress debug sections for Linux/x86 by default

      * config/tc-i386.c (flag_compress_debug): Default to compress
      debug sections for Linux.


-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-18 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 14:46 Joel Brobecker
2015-01-07 16:01 ` Tristan Gingold
2015-01-07 17:02   ` Joel Brobecker
2015-02-19  7:55   ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-02-19  7:58     ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-01-21  7:49 ` ping: " Joel Brobecker
2015-01-21  8:22   ` Tristan Gingold
2015-01-21  8:33     ` Joel Brobecker
2015-02-04  3:57 ` ping^2: " Joel Brobecker
2015-02-18 12:09 ` ping #3: " Joel Brobecker
2015-02-18 12:56   ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-18 16:55     ` Mike Frysinger
2015-02-18 16:58       ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2015-02-18 19:44         ` Mike Frysinger
2015-02-18 19:52           ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-18 20:32             ` Mark Wielaard
2015-02-18 20:42               ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-18 20:53               ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-18 21:54                 ` Mark Wielaard
2015-02-18 22:03                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-18 22:21                     ` Mike Frysinger
2015-02-18 22:24                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-18 23:10                         ` Mike Frysinger
2015-02-19  7:17                     ` Mark Wielaard
2015-02-19 13:52                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-20  8:01                         ` Mark Wielaard
2015-02-18 17:00       ` Joel Sherrill
2015-02-19  2:42     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOqVim3=-RCuWE6GnMKoQ1v9WKaDqfaS2k8MpDz7rA_y3g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).