From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-118422-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26434 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2014 06:06:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 26420 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2014 06:06:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_STOCKGEN,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wg0-f42.google.com
Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:06:34 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so3113801wgh.29        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:06:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.218.74 with SMTP id pe10mr11139994wic.48.1418796390981; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.132.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:06:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m3r3w4hyus.fsf@seba.sebabeach.org>
References: <m3r3w4hyus.fsf@seba.sebabeach.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAP9bCMR_ScuWi=8O5xun2fh7w0VLbq06B+WLEd0_42DsCtnzcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove struct symbol_search member symtab.
From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Since symbols have a backlink to their containing symtab,
> there's no real need to store symtab in struct symbol_search.
> [Is there?]
>
> Regression tested on amd64-linux.
>
> 2014-12-10  Doug Evans  <xdje42@gmail.com>
>
>         * symtab.h (struct symbol_search) <symtab>: Delete.  All uses updated.
>         * symtab.c (compare_search_syms): Use SYMBOL_SYMTAB accessor.
>         (print_symbol_info): Delete arg symtab.  All callers updated.
>         (symtab_symbol_info): Use SYMBOL_SYMTAB accessor.

Committed.