public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>,
	gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9bCMT_Op4E+j9HXz-1aCu0Eu4b_8MktkbX5Em5jwsEr3jn8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A750AA.1080807@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Doug wrote:
>> If we must change things, I would prefer having a predicate
>> and call that first.
>
> I can try that.  Does your script API series already have
> something like that?  I'd guess it's probably touching this
> code too.

Hi.  I read this one after the actual patch.  No worries.

> Yeah, the previous post was just an RFC, I didn't mean to apply
> all of it as a single commit.  In this case, there are two
> implementations of that function (the real one, and then
> the dummy one for when Python isn't configured in), but
> only of them is documented, and I needed to document the
> return code, which affects the dummy version too.  Moving
> to the header sorted that out.  BTW, I realize this is
> probably conflicting with your scripts API series.  ISTR
> that removes the dummy functions anyway, right?  In any
> case, I'll try the predicate way.

Fortunately I anticipated the patch and included a change in my updated series.
It'll need some tweaks if UNSUPPORTED_ERROR is removed but easy enough.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 10:30 Hui Zhu
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-28 10:56   ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-28 17:38     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-29  9:41       ` Hui Zhu
2013-11-29 15:27     ` [pushed] Plug target side conditions and commands leaks (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 16:05     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2013-12-02 12:45       ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-02 14:38         ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-03  4:50           ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-03  4:54             ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-06 19:29             ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-08  5:19               ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-08  8:34                 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-08 14:18                   ` Hui Zhu
2013-12-09 19:48                 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 21:07                   ` Doug Evans
2013-12-10 17:34                     ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 18:14                       ` [PATCH] Eliminate UNSUPPORTED_ERROR Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:33                         ` Doug Evans
2013-12-11 19:17                           ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-12  4:23                             ` Doug Evans
2013-12-12 10:23                               ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-11 16:40                       ` Doug Evans [this message]
2013-12-12 10:55                     ` breakpoint.c:insert_bp_location: Constify local. (was: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet) Pedro Alves
2013-12-12 12:55                     ` [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet Pedro Alves
2014-01-09 18:36                       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAP9bCMT_Op4E+j9HXz-1aCu0Eu4b_8MktkbX5Em5jwsEr3jn8Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xdje42@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hui_zhu@mentor.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).