public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Link to -lssp when available (fixes mingw build)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XE+wQ01kUfe1Hz_BGh191ooHiNDCWYQJP5EafyiYBoaiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f19911a-405e-77b5-e543-4fbb8ee80d8a@redhat.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/19 11:23 PM, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:12 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:40:42 -0600
> >>> Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>a lot of
> >>>
> >>> BTW -- you mentioned a licensing issue with depending on DLLs. Doesn't
> >>> libstdc++ and perhaps others have the same issue? Or does mingw.org
> >>> link it statically?
> >>
> >> libstdc++ and libgcc DLLs indeed have the same problem.  Which is why
> >> I mentioned the fact that the binary of GDB 9.0.90 produced by the
> >> MinGW build had dependencies on these two.  I solved that locally by
> >> linking with "CXX='g++ -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc'", but I
> >> thought Pedro once said these dependencies shouldn't happen, and I
> >> still hope we could understand why they suddenly appeared.
> >
> > Hm, I wonder why Pedro said that. GDB uses good amounts of the C++
> > standard library, so I would totally expect libstdc++ to appear.
>
> There's some confusion going on here.  We must certainly link with
> libstdc++ somehow.  The only question is whether we link to the
> dynamic or static version.  What I've said in the past is that GDB
> inherited the -static-libstdc++ and -static-libgcc from GCC, due to
> the shared top level configure:
>
>   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-07/msg00040.html
>
> Linking with static versions of the runtime is problematic if we also link
> with some other library that is itself linked with a different libstdc++.
> Multiple versions of libstc++/libgcc in a program is a recipe for disaster,
> such as for example C++ exceptions not working properly.  Discussions about
> this started a few years ago when we switched to C++.  E.g.:
>
>   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-02/msg00705.html
>
> That is why the top level configure was recently changed to avoid the
> -static-libstc++/-static-libgcc:
>
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg00287.html
>
> Note that the patch added a new --with-static-standard-libraries
> configure switch which you can use to get back the previous behavior
> of linking with the static versions of the standard libraries.
>
> I think a NEWS entry for that switch would be helpful, though.
>
> > I don't really know what libgcc is used for.
>
> libgcc is GCC's low-level runtime library.  It's an essential part
> of any program compiled by GCC:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Libgcc.html

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Christian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-19 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-18 18:14 Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 18:23 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-18 18:57   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 19:07     ` [PATCH v2] Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on mingw Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-02 11:31       ` Joel Brobecker
2020-01-07 23:43         ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-08  3:30           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-01-09 22:23           ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-09 22:32             ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-10  0:28               ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-10 17:41                 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 19:08     ` [PATCH] Link to -lssp when available (fixes mingw build) Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-18 19:12       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 19:40         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-18 19:50           ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 19:57             ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-18 20:41               ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-18 23:12                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-18 23:24                   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-12-19 14:19                     ` Pedro Alves
2019-12-19 15:49                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-02-15 14:06                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-19 20:41                       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches [this message]
2019-12-19 15:32                     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPTJ0XE+wQ01kUfe1Hz_BGh191ooHiNDCWYQJP5EafyiYBoaiw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=cbiesinger@google.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).