From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113360 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2019 22:40:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 113348 invoked by uid 89); 26 Dec 2019 22:40:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Elis, 25155, UD:msg00277.html, elis X-HELO: mail-ot1-f65.google.com Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com (HELO mail-ot1-f65.google.com) (209.85.210.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:40:19 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id w21so26217308otj.7 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:40:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hlvZxcSaXlNmL6/ZnAq6WjzA4cRSDVkxcu2HZE45+G0=; b=MqMVr9jl4xd0xqTiSzYD7e/I7vn92j2Oq1f17v1/byWVidF7KZmd99g8Fie8C5ubcK jvNMHP2Q8SdrBlkxFSPYkz883HD33qGtuYgN62yM2w4FgAuqlr0S79kikPOpePuQ6V7b CycSw5AuLfSgMZyZ1gbOtLyFzoi7yGDLMgWZTeKOkIEUWHwAWzerKZi6pi5kaaiWX9v/ I1sZ51MBDAF6s9BxgjM/g0UDj8F/2vXcky9JiYdBh5HokmnIA2UWOwvDhcHkyPYQGRHP l+n/S2zIogpNQf092Hs4ufFBFU0jIz/2iV3qR+xYJIcR8jkSC7qRapR2caTbmL3v3iXQ YEXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191223093031.GE11677@adacore.com> <835zi7xh7o.fsf@gnu.org> <20191224034652.GA25918@adacore.com> <831rstwv8g.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831rstwv8g.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" Reply-To: Christian Biesinger Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release 2019-12-23 update To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 5:21 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 07:46:52 +0400 > > From: Joel Brobecker > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > > > - [Eliz] libtcf fails to build on MinGW > > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 > > > > > > > > Problem reported to binutils on Dec 17th, but so far > > > > no answer as far as I can tell. > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00277.html > > > > > > > > If we don't get an answer after the end of year holidays, > > > > I suggest we send in a patch, which will likely help move > > > > things along. From Eli's message on bugzilla, we shouldn't > > > > be far from having one. > > > > > > I already have a patch, so I can apply it whenever you say so. > > > > Let's try to have it reviewed by the binutils folks if we can. > > It seems relatively straightforward, but I tend to avoid fixing > > things in a branch before it gets fixed in master. Maybe send > > the patch to binutils with an RFA? If that doesn't work, then > > we'll consider the option of just patching our branch so > > we can release. > > I added an attachment with the patch to the Bugzilla report, it should > appear shortly on the bug-binutils mailing list. Let's see what > happens next. I don't know how binutils works, but if they work like gdb, it may be worth sending the patch to the binutils mailing list directly instead of relying on people to read bug-binutils? Christian