Hi Ulrich,

>There is one difference between AIX and the way freebsd can handle.
>freebsd gets the parent child relationship via a structure which has
>this info. This is obtained using LWP_INFO option in the ptrace () call.
>However, in AIX we do not have the same luxury of LWP_INFO.

Is there any other way of figuring out what the parent process of
the new child is?  Maybe you should just do that when you get the
child event.

I fully did not get the above suggestion " Maybe you should just do that when you get the
child event ". Kindly let me know what you are trying to tell me in this context.

Have a nice day ahead.

Thanks and regards,
Aditya
________________________________
From: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Sent: 28 October 2022 16:29
To: simark@simark.ca <simark@simark.ca>; Aditya Kamath1 <Aditya.Kamath1@ibm.com>; gdb-patches@sourceware.org <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Sangamesh Mallayya <sangamesh.swamy@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable multi process debugging for AIX

Aditya Kamath1 <Aditya.Kamath1@ibm.com> wrote:

>I have addressed your issue of having a fork () events from other threads.

To clarify: I was not only concerned about *fork* events from other
threads, but *any* events from other threads.  For example, if a
multi-threaded process forks, is it possible that in the time between
the parent and child fork events arrive, some other thread hits a
breakpoint and that event is reported to GDB?

Or if GDB is already debugging multiple processes, could some event
from a completely different process arrive in between?

>I have kept an assertion as well just in case I get some other event
>apart from fork () comes in while I figure out the parent child relationship.
>Ideally, I shouldn't get any other event in AIX.

I believe in the scenarios above, you would run into that assertion.

I still think that the proper fix is to *not* have any secondary
loop around waitpid.  Instead, just use the main GDB event loop;
it'll get back to you once the second event arrives, and in the
meantime other intervening events will be processed as usual.

>There is one difference between AIX and the way freebsd can handle.
>freebsd gets the parent child relationship via a structure which has
>this info. This is obtained using LWP_INFO option in the ptrace () call.
>However, in AIX we do not have the same luxury of LWP_INFO.

Is there any other way of figuring out what the parent process of
the new child is?  Maybe you should just do that when you get the
child event.

>Coming to the W_SFWTED, this also is taken care. Kindly see the
>did_aix_inferior_fork () function.

This logic seems a bit strange to me:

>+  /* If multi-process debug mode is enabled, the status
>+     location is set to W_SFWTED.  */
>+
>+  status = status & 0xff;
>+
>+  /* Eliminate the last few bits. If the W_SFWTED is set
>+     which is equal to 0x7e, it is a fork event otherwise
>+     it is not.  */
>+
>+  if (status ^ W_SFWTED)
>+    return false;
>+  else
>+    return true;

I understand W_SFWTED is not a bit mask, but simply a value.
So shouldn't you just test for "status == W_SFWTED"?  Also,
I'm not sure where the "& 0xff" comes into play.  What are
the contents of the high bits?  The AIX documentation doesn't
seem to say ...


Bye,
Ulrich