RE: [pushed][PATCH v3 1/4] Extended-remote follow exec

["Breazeal, Don" <Don_Breazeal@mentor.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:20 AM
> To: Breazeal, Don; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [pushed][PATCH v3 1/4] Extended-remote follow exec
> 
> Hi Don,
> 
> On 09/11/2015 07:38 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> > @@ -5977,6 +6065,7 @@ remote_parse_stop_reply (char *buf, struct
> stop_reply *event)
> >    struct remote_arch_state *rsa = get_remote_arch_state ();
> >    ULONGEST addr;
> >    char *p;
> > +  int skipregs = 0;
> >
> >    event->ptid = null_ptid;
> >    event->rs = get_remote_state ();
> > @@ -6089,11 +6178,42 @@ Packet: '%s'\n"),
> >  	      event->ws.kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_VFORK_DONE;
> >  	      p = skip_to_semicolon (p1 + 1);
> >  	    }
> > +	  else if (strncmp (p, "exec", p1 - p) == 0)
> > +	    {
> 
> I happened to notice that this is still using strncmp while the rest
> of the magic registers are now using strprefix instead (26d56a939e).
> Looks like a mid-air collision happened.
> This one could be adjusted to use strprefix too, right?
 
Absolutely, thanks for pointing it out.  I will take care of that today.
--Don