From: "Bouhaouel, Mohamed" <mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] gdb, breakpoint: add a destructor to the watchpoint struct
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 14:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4457A90762169CFFBEE1663CE4939@DM6PR11MB4457.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttxvc1yj.fsf@redhat.com>
Thanks Andrew for your feedback.
> > Scenario:
> > (gdb) awatch <VAR>
> > Target does not support this type of hardware watchpoint.
> > (gdb) rwatch <VAR>
> > Target does not support this type of hardware watchpoint.
> > (gdb) <continue the program until the end>
> > >> HANG <<
> >
>
> Is it not possible to create a test case based on this scenario?
It is difficult to produce such scenario due to a weird behavior [1],
which needs to be addressed as well. As a result, deleting watchpoints
before resuming would hide the issue.
[1] When the watch command fails, it is not possible to resume
unless we explicitly delete the watchpoint. More details can be
found here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-March/198371.html)
Kind regards,
Mohamed
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 1:38 PM
> To: Bouhaouel, Mohamed <mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com>; gdb-
> patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdb, breakpoint: add a destructor to the watchpoint
> struct
>
> Mohamed Bouhaouel via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> writes:
>
> > Make sure to unlink the related breakpoint when the watchpoint instance
> > is deleted. This prevents having a wp-related breakpoint that is
> > linked to a NULL watchpoint (e.g. the watchpoint instance is being
> > deleted when the 'watch' command fails). With the below scenario,
> > having such a left out breakpoint will lead to a GDB hang, and this
> > is due to an infinite loop when deleting all inferior breakpoints.
> >
> > Scenario:
> > (gdb) awatch <VAR>
> > Target does not support this type of hardware watchpoint.
> > (gdb) rwatch <VAR>
> > Target does not support this type of hardware watchpoint.
> > (gdb) <continue the program until the end>
> > >> HANG <<
> >
>
> Is it not possible to create a test case based on this scenario?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mohamed Bouhaouel <mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com>
> > ---
> > gdb/breakpoint.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > gdb/breakpoint.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
> > index 7228acfd8fe..b9ddc85c30c 100644
> > --- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
> > +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
> > @@ -9581,6 +9581,21 @@ break_range_command (const char *arg, int
> from_tty)
> > install_breakpoint (false, std::move (br), true);
> > }
> >
> > +/* See breakpoint.h. */
> > +
> > +watchpoint::~watchpoint ()
> > +{
> > + /* Make sure to unlink the destroyed watchpoint from the related
> > + breakpoint ring. */
> > +
> > + breakpoint *bpt = this;
> > + breakpoint *related = bpt;
> > + while (related->related_breakpoint != bpt)
> > + related = related->related_breakpoint;
> > +
> > + related->related_breakpoint = bpt->related_breakpoint;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Return non-zero if EXP is verified as constant. Returned zero
> > means EXP is variable. Also the constant detection may fail for
> > some constant expressions and in such case still falsely return
> > diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.h b/gdb/breakpoint.h
> > index 7c5cf3f2bef..4f19e42dd83 100644
> > --- a/gdb/breakpoint.h
> > +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.h
> > @@ -933,6 +933,9 @@ struct watchpoint : public breakpoint
> > void print_recreate (struct ui_file *fp) const override;
> > bool explains_signal (enum gdb_signal) override;
> >
> > + /* Destructor for WATCHPOINT. */
> > + virtual ~watchpoint ();
> > +
> > /* String form of exp to use for displaying to the user (malloc'd),
> > or NULL if none. */
> > gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> exp_string;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> > Intel Deutschland GmbH
> > Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
> > Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
> > Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva
> > Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
> > Registered Office: Munich
> > Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-04 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 14:54 Mohamed Bouhaouel
2023-04-04 11:37 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-04-04 14:38 ` Bouhaouel, Mohamed [this message]
2023-04-04 16:29 ` Bouhaouel, Mohamed
2023-04-04 18:27 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4457A90762169CFFBEE1663CE4939@DM6PR11MB4457.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=mohamed.bouhaouel@intel.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).