public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] gdb, gdbserver: support dlmopen()
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:24:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB5749389F620BF53A563CCF5CDE0A9@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2c55703-a5fb-3d85-cf34-797b47a92fd4@palves.net>

Hello Pedro,

>Should the commit have a Co-Authored-By: tag for H.J.?

Definitely.  I didn't know we were using such tags.


>I'm wondering whether ideally symbol lookup would be updated to handle
>different namespaces.  I'm thinking of for example
>svr4_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order.

Do you mean that we should restrict the search to the namespace of the
current_objfile argument?  And use, say, the default namespace if that is nullptr?


>Can you describe what xml changes were necessary?  Do we need to update
>the manual where the xml/packet are described?

This patch doesn't change the XML so everything ends up in a flat list and GDB
doesn't really know about namespaces.  This prevents incremental updates
and would also prevent things like the above.

I had planned to leave support for that for backwards compatibility and update
the XML to pass namespaces for future versions.  See also
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-February/186135.html.

If we need GDB to know about namespaces, however, this wouldn't work and
we'd instead need to conditionalize namespace support based on gdbserver
features.

Regards,
Markus.
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva  
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 14:28 Markus Metzger
2022-01-21 11:42 ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-03-01 19:10 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-09 12:23   ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-03-03 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-09 12:24   ` Metzger, Markus T [this message]
2022-03-09 14:15     ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-29 16:13       ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-04-08 12:40         ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-05-25 17:12 ` Kevin Buettner
2022-05-31  9:29   ` Metzger, Markus T
2022-05-31 18:44     ` Ben Woodard
2022-05-24 18:40 Ben Woodard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM8PR11MB5749389F620BF53A563CCF5CDE0A9@DM8PR11MB5749.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).