From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-75220-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20003 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2010 10:09:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 19994 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2010 10:09:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_05,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:08:54 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Oq1II-0003mN-Gh; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:08:50 -0400
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (message from	Jan Kratochvil on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:24:07 +0200)
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20100830071040.GB6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008300814.o7U8ECNZ009010@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Message-Id: <E1Oq1II-0003mN-Gh@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:09:00 -0000
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:24:07 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:14:12 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The _t suffix is actually reserved by POSIX, so using it is actually a
> > bad idea.  Perhaps change it to gdb_target_signal, or just
> > target_signal (making it a typedef for an anonymous enum)?
> 
> I see too many types in GDB and everywhere ending with _t (ptid_t for all).

Right, and I didn't know it was reserved.  Mark, could you please
point to the Posix document (hopefully, freely accessible) which says
that?  TIA