From: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] gdb: fix display of thread condition for multi-location breakpoints
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:37:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR1101MB2271B61F3879DAC2DB75513BC4E99@MWHPR1101MB2271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <685ac9c3cc26e43c47b1a5fd3a59f7e97c5eca2b.1669634536.git.aburgess@redhat.com>
On Monday, November 28, 2022 12:26 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> If a breakpoint with multiple locations has a thread condition, then
> the 'info breakpoints' output is a little messed up, here's an example
> of the current output:
>
> (gdb) break foo thread 1
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x401114: foo. (3 locations)
> (gdb) break bar thread 1
> Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: file /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c, line
> 32.
> (gdb) info breakpoints
> Num Type Disp Enb Address What
> 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE> thread 1
> stop only in thread 1
> 2.1 y 0x0000000000401114 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25
> 2.2 y 0x0000000000401146 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25
> 2.3 y 0x0000000000401168 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25
> 3 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040110a in bar at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:32 thread 1
> stop only in thread 1
>
> Notice that, at the end of the location for breakpoint 3, the 'thread
> 1' condition is printed.
>
> In contrast, for breakpoint 2, the 'thread 1' appears randomly, in the
> "What" column, though slightly offset.
>
> I believe this is a bug in GDB, in the function
> print_one_breakpoint_location, due to checking the local variable
> part_of_multiple, instead of header_of_multiple.
>
> If I fix this oversight, then the output is now:
>
> (gdb) break foo thread 1
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x401114: foo. (3 locations)
> (gdb) break bar thread 1
> Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: file /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c, line
> 32.
> (gdb) info breakpoints
> Num Type Disp Enb Address What
> 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
> stop only in thread 1
> 2.1 y 0x0000000000401114 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1
> 2.2 y 0x0000000000401146 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1
> 2.3 y 0x0000000000401168 in foo at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:25 thread 1
> 3 breakpoint keep y 0x000000000040110a in bar at
> /tmp/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c:32 thread 1
> stop only in thread 1
We already state the condition in "stop only in thread 1".
Do we need to repeat it also as part of the location?
> The 'thread 1' condition is now displayed at the end of each location,
> which makes the output the same for single location breakpoints and
> multi-location breakpoints.
> ---
> gdb/breakpoint.c | 2 +-
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c | 44 ++++++++++
> .../gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.exp | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.exp
>
> diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
> index f0276a963c0..2ec8ca364b6 100644
> --- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
> +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
> @@ -6467,7 +6467,7 @@ print_one_breakpoint_location (struct breakpoint *b,
> output_thread_groups (uiout, "thread-groups", inf_nums, mi_only);
> }
>
> - if (!part_of_multiple)
> + if (!header_of_multiple)
> {
> if (b->thread != -1)
> {
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-
> bp-multi-loc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..cab009c39ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
> +
> + Copyright 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> + (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +volatile int global_var = 0;
> +
> +__attribute__((__always_inline__)) static inline void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
> + global_var = i;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +bar (void)
> +{
> + global_var = 0;
> + foo ();
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main (void)
> +{
> + global_var = 0;
> + foo ();
> + bar ();
> + foo ();
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-
> bp-multi-loc.exp
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..9abff5866d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/thread-bp-multi-loc.exp
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +# Copyright 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> +
> +# Create a multi-location breakpoint with a thread condition, then check the
> +# output of 'info breakpoints' to ensure that the thread condition is
> +# displayed correctly.
> +
> +standard_testfile
> +
> +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } {
> + return
> +}
> +
> +if ![runto_main] then {
Maybe use {} here, too, for consistency.
> + return
The testsuite is unfortunately highly inconsistent about what to do here.
There is "return 0", "return 1", "return -1", and "return".
If we cannot run to the main function, "return -1" seems a better choice
to me. What do you think?
> +}
> +
> +gdb_test_no_output "with confirm off -- delete breakpoints"
Why not use delete_breakpoints?
> +
> +set bp_number ""
> +gdb_test_multiple "break foo thread 1" "" {
> + -re "^break foo thread 1\r\n" {
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re "^Breakpoint ($decimal) at $hex: foo\[^\r\n\]+3 locations\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
> + set bp_number $expect_out(1,string)
> + exp_continue
> + }
> + -re "^$gdb_prompt $" {
> + gdb_assert { ![string eq $bp_number ""] }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +if { $bp_number == "" } {
> + unresolved "breakpoint not placed correctly"
> + return
> +}
An alternative could be to use "gdb_breakpoint" followed by
set bp_number [get_integer_valueof "\$bpnum" 0]
> +
> +set saw_header false
> +set saw_cond false
> +set loc_count 0
> +gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoints" "" {
> + -re "^info breakpoints\r\n" {
> + exp_continue
> + }
> +
> + -re "^Num\\s+\[^\r\n\]+\r\n" {
If we remove "^" at the beginning, we can also get rid of the
first regexp above for a bit shorter code.
Thanks
-Baris
> + exp_continue
> + }
> +
> + -re "^$bp_number\\s+breakpoint\\s+keep\\s+y\\s+<MULTIPLE>\\s*\r\n" {
> + set saw_header true
> + exp_continue
> + }
> +
> + -re "^\\s+stop only in thread 1\r\n" {
> + set saw_cond true
> + exp_continue
> + }
> +
> + -re "^$bp_number\\.\[123\]\\s+\[^\r\n\]+ thread 1\r\n" {
> + incr loc_count
> + exp_continue
> + }
> +
> + -re "^$gdb_prompt $" {
> + with_test_prefix $gdb_test_name {
> + gdb_assert { $saw_header } \
> + "saw header line"
> + gdb_assert { $saw_cond } \
> + "saw b/p condition line"
> + gdb_assert { $loc_count == 3 } \
> + "saw all three locations"
> + }
> + }
> +}
> --
> 2.25.4
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de <http://www.intel.de>
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Sharon Heck, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-23 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 11:25 [PATCH 0/6] Inferior specific breakpoints Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] gdb/remote: announce thread exit events for remote targets Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] gdb/testsuite: don't try to set non-stop mode on a running target Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] gdb: fix display of thread condition for multi-location breakpoints Andrew Burgess
2022-12-23 8:37 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris [this message]
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] gdb: error if 'thread' or 'task' keywords are overused Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 13:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] gdb: add inferior-specific breakpoints and watchpoints Andrew Burgess
2022-11-28 13:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-23 10:05 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-01-19 19:13 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 13:12 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2022-11-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] gdb: convert the 'start' breakpoint to use inferior keyword Andrew Burgess
2022-12-23 10:17 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2022-12-23 10:55 ` [PATCH 0/6] Inferior specific breakpoints Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 " Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 1/6] gdb/remote: announce thread exit events for remote targets Andrew Burgess
2023-02-02 17:50 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-04 15:46 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 2/6] gdb/testsuite: don't try to set non-stop mode on a running target Andrew Burgess
2023-02-04 16:22 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 3/6] gdb: fix display of thread condition for multi-location breakpoints Andrew Burgess
2023-02-02 18:13 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-06 14:48 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-06 17:01 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-07 14:42 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 4/6] gdb: error if 'thread' or 'task' keywords are overused Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 13:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-02 14:08 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-02 14:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-02 18:21 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-03 16:41 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-04 5:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-04 15:40 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-06 11:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 5/6] gdb: add inferior-specific breakpoints and watchpoints Andrew Burgess
2023-01-20 13:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-02 19:17 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-03 16:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-06 17:24 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-16 12:56 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-01-20 9:46 ` [PATCHv2 6/6] gdb: convert the 'start' breakpoint to use inferior keyword Andrew Burgess
2023-02-16 12:59 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2023-03-16 17:03 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] Inferior specific breakpoints Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 17:03 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] gdb: cleanup around some set_momentary_breakpoint_at_pc calls Andrew Burgess
2023-04-03 14:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 17:03 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] gdb: add inferior-specific breakpoints Andrew Burgess
2023-04-03 14:14 ` [PATCHv4] " Andrew Burgess
2023-05-15 19:15 ` [PATCHv5] " Andrew Burgess
2023-05-30 20:41 ` [PATCHv6] " Andrew Burgess
2023-07-07 10:23 ` [PATCHv7] " Andrew Burgess
2023-08-17 15:53 ` [PUSHEDv8] " Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 8:06 ` [PUSHED] gdb: add missing notify_breakpoint_modified call Andrew Burgess
2023-08-23 8:19 ` [PUSHED] gdb/testsuite: improve MI support for inferior specific breakpoints Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR1101MB2271B61F3879DAC2DB75513BC4E99@MWHPR1101MB2271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).