From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAEB385801E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:48:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DEAEB385801E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 559) id 791F7340F90; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:18:58 +0545 From: Mike Frysinger To: Tsukasa OI Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/1] sim/testsuite: Trim extra path from arch Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Tsukasa OI , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <28df7073ec5a8f601ba47c9d2f7d4a7a0ce08753.1657795051.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> <7e383f23-1568-2129-d717-2b7fc45f860b@irq.a4lg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l0DD0ZBiQMfToRld" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e383f23-1568-2129-d717-2b7fc45f860b@irq.a4lg.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --l0DD0ZBiQMfToRld Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24 Oct 2022 15:31, Tsukasa OI wrote: > On 2022/10/24 4:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 27 Aug 2022 01:53, Tsukasa OI wrote: > >> However, this block doesn't work because the `arch' variable returned = by > >> the `sim_arch' function is "./aarch64". That is supposed to be "aarch= 64". > >=20 > > i don't mind fixing sim_arch, but this really should be fixed too. we > > shouldn't be in a situation where "./aarch64" is present as an input. > >=20 > > seems easy enough to do so i pushed a patch for it. >=20 > That worked perfectly! >=20 > I'll withdraw this patchset and close the bug report. i don't mind merging your patch too with a fixed up message -mike --l0DD0ZBiQMfToRld Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmNWP+UACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YGMAQ/9Gl7UPmmOPOr9VR1TKnx7X0g0C6OsXb6YY9StbFxmCrXH0Pgn9l5V1pk2 7mq0SN15tsFZLkt/N8z1QJWRsnHgAUpAHK//Y0YzsTwO2tu70Hu7gIQeukV2MqYL Y3MUD6oiRZvowfsbaG6un01gc30Yw9otMNAR3bdVhaQ1WM3gwJeUUiOTUUhRAQqp UAkcu+USgAC15lyOp7PS71ZyoX5VmKbe/hw9f7RAqaBpR+d3OMETsipOpXXPGNEb PAdUG1KPOUSruOlIiZ9Bo/Q0U4B1O4x2DZECwS6puHbxMIYBTKKmQtxb/WVDZESY 36FOrpJJe7cg1sK08B7Sr9ij8zj86ijq+ZL2r77vJ8DLXX/QEt1lMp/JssJkfHFW 26q1b/DraP+l0LJ1M4QCBx/0p/BgyTRfu+PvM2RsewQAYfh8/uAdrMuOnxcMG/n8 MnZWAvF3epyfTh+0JD6wMkxnoFVKNZMhjBP2ThnKcZZu2wJ0ezgIvJy/JhY7bEOd f6w4GPihzxv4fJk9y3ZkQ9K6iqm7rQc9bIaSBw5v+N+pRjczLOFPTYnB+41U3XFv 6rlmam6Jig0ainoG7NfrfKD49KFmhdIEowcTmkF1wTZ95nOhHLk/IISOfV789VJD 7Y+QOtCk8kf3tlQC8Z0Jj2l5eziVokR/JlK9w/sMBZPGt5wMNlU= =AoFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l0DD0ZBiQMfToRld--