From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4238C3858425 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 06:37:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4238C3858425 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=adacore.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=adacore.com Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id i7so6235091wrv.8 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:37:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adacore.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bEyRjpxwC9QMNseV+BkysiFIfBDbUedg4eO7GOoP1D8=; b=V6OcWIKNNWEN2kAY7LqJfKanSXEInDFJyMIHz9dpBOPenaNB8DEOYKRKolLMVO+oj+ P2rEq3MVM/0ZI9f3deivUIZpuDEj/zCayYiM+sEkr63rMUD32UwP8BNMhLyWhpJTBpes SCD/BYRuha/3oupmGFWFuwCGNgiFptgsfvZsbET+di++WHNnorbsweBUTTQDlnfCQs/B TWTpkWXBDEBllXDqyZ1ewLzXI80h+/oSOsLn7P8VVrPC77noak8w53dnrD09hLT62z6e IgZVhklZLrYOeCaUXi+/vrpyvftPcE9graIX6dQ8GXkjgpCedQalvup+FIAjVPPITmSR +03A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bEyRjpxwC9QMNseV+BkysiFIfBDbUedg4eO7GOoP1D8=; b=B/yBFods5R41iQWp5NUXXnHAN4wQ92s3tbDCpI/JqyCfqFBxzvkHWrsFxFjHJuApGQ l0Pkyf+V4tTy4rCm/7AxxiJl+QTGoUZi/PHd8hnjkVRe/5/cbhQvUN3XpuPjiOJouFnv c9WqnliDK8XYdL6NpiJicfJerGslcFSUbDpqq7llbReRgzYlFZPDQLzuEr6cZmM3oaxU tX6JpkrVGz4cW7WBKsBYWg7VuaaBJHRK4zbrglwUcxQn642hxege4Itf1b0vNGU1lAVU DRrr04IQhNfg21nwXxCZKCPQPSP1JaKuCqq1QOy+3pW75Nr6Xod4yArThB/SWCXt2LC7 s1lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr48kUEXEf1BpsBK5vyBmClEyFgsCTFmlXR6EFJD0o3T/aoRYt/ vlYEqI3UbKZv1LBFfkUbUiwgVAFZIzIyW2hbUrdE X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsSz3JtaUuBeZQug7Vkx9akuxFjLqFVSKh4yIfdC27AmkUMrocCqkvv+N6laDNv9omeP8J86Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:668f:0:b0:242:91e:6a78 with SMTP id l15-20020a5d668f000000b00242091e6a78mr6837951wru.34.1671863833025; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from takamaka.gnat.com (lfbn-reu-1-488-54.w92-130.abo.wanadoo.fr. [92.130.77.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18-20020adfa4d2000000b00241cfa9333fsm5049069wrb.5.2022.12.23.22.37.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by takamaka.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7244481AE6; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 10:37:10 +0400 (+04) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 10:37:10 +0400 From: Joel Brobecker To: Simon Sobisch Cc: gdb-patches ml , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: GDB 13 release branch created! - [PING][PATCH v8] gdb: split array and string limiting options Message-ID: References: <20221218043825.7A9B080B46@takamaka.gnat.com> <5ba2419c-3c4c-5c73-4ddc-589d13211ac3@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ba2419c-3c4c-5c73-4ddc-589d13211ac3@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Does this mean that the "split array and string limiting options" is now > unlikely to even land in GDB 13? This is not excluded, but for it to be in GDB 13, it first needs to land in master. Once in master, a Global Maintainer can evaluate its impact on GDB 13 and help determine whether it would be suitable for GDB 13 or not. My personal opinion looking at the patch series and its objective is that it would be prudent from a UI perspective to give this patch some time to mature in master first, before being introduced in a release. > After the latest "ping" there was nothing open, maybe I've just missed its > integration? > > Looking at https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=string > it doesn't look like the patches are applied yet - but so far I've not seen > a single reason that those aren't. The GDB community unfortunately relies on a small group of volunteer maintainers who dedicate as much time as they can, but we know unfortunately that this is not enough. This kind of situation is sadly an unwanted byproduct of the lack of volunteer time. -- Joel