From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7DC385840A for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:04:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0F7DC385840A Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 559) id EEEF734341B; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 19:04:15 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Dragan Mladjenovic , "Maciej W . Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Chao-ying Fu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] sim: Add support for MIPS32/64 revision 6 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Dragan Mladjenovic , "Maciej W . Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Chao-ying Fu References: <20210520074554.1465327-1-fshahbazker@wavecomp.com> <20220202101725.23671-1-Dragan.Mladjenovic@syrmia.com> <0a600dcf-1356-d08a-58a9-3f909c540d0a@syrmia.com> <58befa26-1b87-36a0-57e1-8aca589dc925@syrmia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BFAqaHpp3N6B57af" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:04:16 -0000 --BFAqaHpp3N6B57af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13 Feb 2022 17:43, Joel Brobecker via Gdb-patches wrote: > > Original changes are either fully owned by Wave (wavecomp.com) or possi= bly > > with addition of RT-RK (rt-rk.com). In any case those two > > are covered by FSF assignments. I doubt that my changes done on behalf > > of Syrmia are significant enough to require additional FSF assignment, > > but that might be a reason I couldn't directly push the patches. > >=20 > > Do we need to wait with these patches until this gets sorted out on my = part? >=20 > I'm afraid so. The size and number of patches is such that we can't > accept them under the "tiny patch" rule. so we're clear, the patches before Dragan become involved should be cleared. the changes he made on top of them is what he was referring to. Dagan: can you follow the FSF copyright assignment just to avoid any further confusion. -mike --BFAqaHpp3N6B57af Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmIJnH8ACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YGLxhAA2oQso1HkoDEiveuuLDtY67qYtwA/AUdwK/uXbL5aFOJsneibDKGmrP7s vVhJcZRDP7SJI5oJFG4F/7P8efa82iEIcXjv+DZ9PwcWweFrAlrO3Crg1prayDWG o2gTAxahKj0cdcLHoV1haXzjiEkDhWevqY3Ft+bWdZZaMEJfQp4lwPg6CHq/U0tu arVfOZHp45B6ElGk5hss7pghLZ0vG8eKEruj0ZYVZYNw1ebnWPclNspyNGQDECHM +dQL11l78/N/ENrRRN9DNcvogBJJZZqJNcejPIxYkAVaqwiyZzCu7YelBxHKu2T9 aDkiu+B6GPr4X4b0Mdh6z8UkrL42EfYuSwk5cdhFE0KrShkNEH1FixznpA1+Gv8h BlfzoCjLRNo+GBrXqk5KPklOSg17j/00UcjBDaQB/cpIWK3EOvIZia9Bl1ClAbSu FCVe1t1xPeTwGazQ2TPJu/G9wMngccWWAn+wIALaigiAkt4XeNLWXH2wJXwMdBIr mka5L9cKFoGvc59ndKO/O38ttgvJvDivy7o78/pp2j1lxMdZsV+acZ98U7OuX739 RieFYN5lJP/oy1NIa3dXpaqF427oQglDI391zWOXVasiITgypeq26kkyuy3telUc mWk6eARUcslOg4/TUXOoculeqDt0hodcra8b6aou+Us2vuQqd34= =b0nW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BFAqaHpp3N6B57af--