From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AA23858D28 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:03:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 04AA23858D28 Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 66so5574572pga.12 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JwwKzBjghGMLaA1HTBdiP//wpdkN2UdJLz9FzFkjcGc=; b=Ugb1rMiWq6qxaAQh83fuQgo5MlCLl2Wf1er4HtNcf5tfCs0eJZUgOiVB5tYJwB2FLw 2+0JCF9TKCD6hOF04wzuB2jRb/wR/9Wd8BYyBfEw1mJ9WU4xAarrsTpgI6p0GXP1EBal zGwIcE6u75hyeD8qgXGpPVXnSH9kPEx8RJFqknUViu0qfUbxB2HksRuShCUohqCxjZIp qOmWqU+nsh22JwruBfiJC8/bjFXzWFqQp48AfhNFnfZ9EOrAUsZJpY5Vu5hbSUlyNHWj jfqYBEbwYuORy3HaaY1xc1rJkruTvXXu8vjNHeOFFziXmZKQoJSsTCI9505RtwFzXPIR sTvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532g2quucXGLP0AYhtcl9Rdu5orsOhw/vlv1IjqPgPD1mo178U1h zlA39CEfG8tc9MEAvA1j72wn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7PNx3ciKWYQlQ0wtICJwYpziDoUNMYu789LQLdVcCFuzfxR9NyuOvd5hXl/9DuXVGg4unYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6e88:0:b0:382:3851:50c8 with SMTP id bm8-20020a656e88000000b00382385150c8mr12623373pgb.270.1649354601025; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from takamaka.home ([184.69.131.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4-20020a056a0014c400b004fb0c7b3813sm24137981pfu.134.2022.04.07.11.03.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 11:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by takamaka.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74D9CA7574; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:03:19 -0700 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, ssbssa@yahoo.de, pedro@palves.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing Message-ID: References: <87sfqx864d.fsf@redhat.com> <83fsmx59wi.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee2h59m2.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmm096dc.fsf@redhat.com> <83zgl44w1m.fsf@gnu.org> <1379565857.1750775.1648990951974@mail.yahoo.com> <1113857996.1779276.1648999598328@mail.yahoo.com> <83czhyfa8i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wng1b161.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83wng1b161.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 18:03:23 -0000 > Can we please finalize the fix for this? The following patch, which > is a variation on the patch that Andrew sent, works for me. If there > are no objections, I'd like to install it on both branches (with a > suitable log message describing the misbehavior on MS-Windows). The patch seems reasonable to me, but this is only FWIW, as I do not have good knowledge of this area. I'd like to do some testing, to see if I can reproduce the issue you've seen, since Hannes was also able to reproduce. And I will also try to test your patch in our setup as well. Hopefully this weekend. -- Joel