From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9C13857B9B; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 01:18:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6C9C13857B9B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-686d8c8fc65so1940430b3a.0; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691803127; x=1692407927; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CwNC8GE0PDvlUzjeP5q/EtWskI/4f7XtEgjlgBtleIk=; b=OP6YlOyyG5Cw1EJEr4QGudJEYIOwfHdw+erc9qQk2XNeFtGi7GwrN2gCPKHUnGnolY pT33gFvmQpHbVZ0zFeibX11pvztHdrq3eROl3Zcpt45C8G27Wb1fsX9ZpvTg+waXoOfH KcyVWdNAlx2SBi97hsmELyeRIHBG0Wkg5vYBHoICJti1hCsE2GqiF/uvqVYr3FIdWFOo 4QlaPXem6P4y4yq37ikLAzpqSj+NdQoDKRJm+RGASO7MBOsZvfzdMON7OV9ZequmNthI y5zK4p4PLJYTXFg/JQanQ8/Rjl1m0t5lH0vIM2bPGGDzb53lDd7rViEkaQCW0VZ6rs0R 6iNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691803127; x=1692407927; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CwNC8GE0PDvlUzjeP5q/EtWskI/4f7XtEgjlgBtleIk=; b=eQ8Zjg0ufLoH2Kfj7GPU0eNosum/9tVcsVr/2W+FaHrgh5fSSzqQfTBcJizywmHC0t lVt2Feov0XgNyPlhBSNNWPkf3JrS9FyML8uTqTJ2vKbgrcR2Tl4rlrKM/Bhrwr8J0nbi cdXMQmwQKPFpzWLmwynnkFOohNcJMAZzfdcBaB4gDF61FU1FKWQNTlVE4d09L6uUyOWI 05B6EXPa+s/PRqQI2xUQXVQklm16ojdyareEbMal566hiaxB0GU25Jljpt7F9lvfctvb ccNeCvvZIva/JNGdiSVBAkZU4z95boEMfG68z9yTTzeEgaCnsyddPcfWjCjNMLkRqjj1 brPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyEAA2FJFx6nH/rhxuxeCgLMeTtUU/ptEa93dw1/BtZaBbLRbVw 2XnrGS0ipAm9cOJOD+WO4++pEzYrXdQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGmEMKLPczBJtS2WRpR3wiPjBmwCmdGr8/buUTfOBPoKf7U86VxXSoqiaj+U0yjixqVM7A9/g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:428a:b0:13d:d5bd:7593 with SMTP id o10-20020a056a20428a00b0013dd5bd7593mr3826584pzj.12.1691803127381; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org ([2406:3400:51d:8cc0:4a73:bf1c:cb84:b5dd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a170902c10d00b001b896686c78sm4568995pli.66.2023.08.11.18.18.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CDD8114013B; Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:48:44 +0930 (ACST) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:48:44 +0930 From: Alan Modra To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, Jason Merrill Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/45] Synchronize shared build infrastructure with GCC tree Message-ID: References: <20230807111029.2320238-1-arsen@aarsen.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230807111029.2320238-1-arsen@aarsen.me> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3026.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 01:07:03PM +0200, Arsen Arsenović via Binutils wrote: > This patch set, combined with a sibling patch set sent on the GCC ML, > bring up the shared infrastructure between the two projects in sync > again. I committed this patch series with some alterations: - The zlib change in "Do not build the ununsed libffi shared library" is fixed. - Regeneration is done in a final patch, with one exception where a config/ file is deleted. - ChangeLog patches are removed. - commit log messages are trimmed. Jason, I didn't change the subject line of "c++: source position of lambda captures [PR84471]" because the subject lines are one way to find the originating patch in the gcc repo, if anyone wants to do that. Yes, it might have been better to keep cherry-pick commit hashes but those were mostly lost and I wasn't inclined to dig through the gcc logs to find them all. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM