public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamil Rytarowski <kamil@netbsd.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Propose GDB 10 branch this Fri-Sun (Sep 11-13) [2020-09-05 Update]
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 02:07:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a149c979-dc98-0c7a-cc80-881508a865e2@netbsd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200905205318.GA30158@adacore.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1903 bytes --]

Personally, I would like to see gdbserver for NetBSD/amd64 merged for
GDB 10.

The code is pending upstream and requires more reviewers.

On 05.09.2020 22:53, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Below is another status update before branching. We're almost there,
> and if all goes well, I propose we create the branch during the weekend
> of Fri-Sun Sep 11-13, immediately followed by creating the first
> prerelease.
> 
> Fixed Since the Previous Update:
> --------------------------------
> 
> <none>
> 
> Added Since the Last Update:
> ----------------------------
> 
> <none> (Yay! ;-) )
> 
> Other Ongoing Items:
> --------------------
> 
>   * [TomT/HannesD] <PR win32/25302>
>     Mismatching fstat() function calls in gdb_bfd_open() and cache_bstat()
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25302
> 
>     Latest discussion at:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169670.html
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170681.html
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171249.html
> 
>     Tom sent a patch locally changing gnulib (reviewed and OK-ed by
>     yours truly, but with a request to wait a bit before getting it in):
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/171660.html
> 
>   * [TomT] <PR rust/26197>
>     rust FAILs with rustc 1.36.0 and llvm 7
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26197
> 
>     Patch pushed:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170764.html
> 
>     At the stage where we are just XFAIL-ing the remaining failures.
>     I'd say we have the most important part of the fix, and whatever
>     is left can easily be backported to the branch if needed.
> 
> Not Critical, but Requested:
> ----------------------------
> 
>   <none>
> 
> Cheers!
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-05 20:53 Joel Brobecker
2020-09-07  0:07 ` Kamil Rytarowski [this message]
2020-09-07 20:02   ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-08 13:49     ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-08 13:51       ` Kamil Rytarowski
2020-09-10 15:01         ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-08 15:40 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-09-08 17:06   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-10 15:03 ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a149c979-dc98-0c7a-cc80-881508a865e2@netbsd.org \
    --to=kamil@netbsd.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).