Personally, I would like to see gdbserver for NetBSD/amd64 merged for
GDB 10.

The code is pending upstream and requires more reviewers.

On 05.09.2020 22:53, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Below is another status update before branching. We're almost there,
> and if all goes well, I propose we create the branch during the weekend
> of Fri-Sun Sep 11-13, immediately followed by creating the first
> prerelease.
> 
> Fixed Since the Previous Update:
> --------------------------------
> 
> <none>
> 
> Added Since the Last Update:
> ----------------------------
> 
> <none> (Yay! ;-) )
> 
> Other Ongoing Items:
> --------------------
> 
>   * [TomT/HannesD] <PR win32/25302>
>     Mismatching fstat() function calls in gdb_bfd_open() and cache_bstat()
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25302
> 
>     Latest discussion at:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169670.html
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170681.html
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171249.html
> 
>     Tom sent a patch locally changing gnulib (reviewed and OK-ed by
>     yours truly, but with a request to wait a bit before getting it in):
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/171660.html
> 
>   * [TomT] <PR rust/26197>
>     rust FAILs with rustc 1.36.0 and llvm 7
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26197
> 
>     Patch pushed:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-July/170764.html
> 
>     At the stage where we are just XFAIL-ing the remaining failures.
>     I'd say we have the most important part of the fix, and whatever
>     is left can easily be backported to the branch if needed.
> 
> Not Critical, but Requested:
> ----------------------------
> 
>   <none>
> 
> Cheers!
>