public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] Rewrite the DWARF "partial" reader
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:31:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a41f7ce7-013a-c0cb-e57d-e8324409ecb3@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf4nlws2.fsf@tromey.com>

On 8/26/21 11:29 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> These all pass for me:
> 
> Tom> ERROR: Couldn't load cpexprs-debug-types into GDB (eof).
> 
> # of expected passes		393
> 

This fails intermittently for me, so that could indeed be a
thread-safety bug (using worker_threads=1/unlimited):
...
$ total=100; worker_threads=1; pass=0; for n in $(seq 1 $total); do gdb
-q -batch -iex "maint set worker-threads $worker_threads"
./outputs/gdb.cp/cpexprs-debug-types/cpexprs-debug-types >LOG 2>ERR; if
[ $? -eq 0 ]; then pass=$(($pass + 1)); fi; done; echo "PASS: $pass/$total"
PASS: 100/100
$ total=100; worker_threads=unlimited; pass=0; for n in $(seq 1 $total);
do gdb -q -batch -iex "maint set worker-threads $worker_threads"
./outputs/gdb.cp/cpexprs-debug-types/cpexprs-debug-types >LOG 2>ERR; if
[ $? -eq 0 ]; then pass=$(($pass + 1)); fi; done; echo "PASS: $pass/$total"
PASS: 62/100
...

The run above is with gcc-7, using gcc-11 I ran twice and got "PASS:
96/100" and "PASS: 100/100".  So, perhaps less likely to fail with newer
gcc?

> Tom> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-using-debug-str.exp: file dw2-using-debug-str
> 
> # of expected passes		3
> 

This fails reliably for me, with gcc-7 - gcc-11.

I think basically the problem is that we get:
...
(gdb) file
/home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-using-debug-str/dw2-using-debug-str-no-debug-str^M
Reading symbols from
/home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-using-debug-str/dw2-using-debug-str-no-debug-str...^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
Dwarf Error: DW_FORM_strp used without required section^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-using-debug-str.exp: file dw2-using-debug-str
...
while the test-case expects just one dwarf error.  I don't know whether
that should be solved by only emitting one dwarf error, or updating the
test-case.

I don't understand though why you don't see this.  Is the threading
somehow not activated in that test-case?  Or is this some timing issue
where the first dwarf error cancels the other threads before they get to
emit the other dwarf errors?

> Tom> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.exp: ptype func
> Tom> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.exp: break func
> Tom> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.exp: continue to func
> Tom> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu.exp: frame in func
> 
> # of expected passes		6

This fails intermittently for me, so that could indeed be a
thread-safety bug (using worker_threads=1/unlimited):
...
$ total=100; worker_threads=1; pass=0; for n in $(seq 1 $total); do gdb
-q -batch -iex "maint set worker-threads $worker_threads"
outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu/fission-multi-cu -ex "ptype func"
>LOG 2>ERR; if grep -q 'type = int (int)' LOG; then pass=$(($pass + 1));
fi; done; echo "PASS: $pass/$total"
PASS: 100/100
$ total=100; worker_threads=unlimited; pass=0; for n in $(seq 1 $total);
do gdb -q -batch -iex "maint set worker-threads $worker_threads"
outputs/gdb.dwarf2/fission-multi-cu/fission-multi-cu -ex "ptype func"
>LOG 2>ERR; if grep -q 'type = int (int)' LOG; then pass=$(($pass + 1));
fi; done; echo "PASS: $pass/$total"
*** Error in `/home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/gdb': malloc(): memory
corruption: 0x00007fe544009790 ***
*** Error in `/home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/gdb': free(): invalid
pointer: 0x00007fe544000994 ***
PASS: 95/100
...

The run above is with gcc-7, with gcc-11 I got: "PASS: 97/100" and
"PASS: 95/100", so that's pretty similar.

Thanks,
- Tom

> 
> 
> Maybe it's compiler dependent?
> Or perhaps some kind of thread-safety bug.
> 
> Tom
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-27  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-26  2:19 Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 01/30] Introduce make_unique_xstrndup Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 02/30] Split create_addrmap_from_aranges Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 03/30] Add dwarf2_per_cu_data::addresses_seen Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 04/30] Refactor dwarf2_get_pc_bounds Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 05/30] Allow ada_decode not to decode operators Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 06/30] Let skip_one_die not skip children Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 07/30] Add name splitting Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 08/30] Add new overload of dwarf5_djb_hash Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 09/30] Refactor build_type_psymtabs_reader Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 10/30] Add batching parameter to parallel_for_each Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 11/30] Return vector of results from parallel_for_each Tom Tromey
2021-08-27  6:20   ` Tom de Vries
2021-08-28 19:20     ` Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 12/30] Introduce DWARF abbrev cache Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 13/30] Statically examine abbrev properties Tom Tromey
2021-09-06 22:31   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 18:00     ` Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 14/30] Update skip_one_die for new " Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 15/30] Introduce the new DWARF index class Tom Tromey
2021-09-09 23:32   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 18:03     ` Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 16/30] The new DWARF indexer Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 17/30] Implement quick_symbol_functions for cooked DWARF index Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 18/30] Wire in the new DWARF indexer Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 19/30] Pre-read DWARF section data Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 20/30] Parallelize DWARF indexing Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 21/30] "Finalize" the DWARF index in the background Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 22/30] Rename write_psymtabs_to_index Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 23/30] Change the key type in psym_index_map Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 24/30] Change parameters to write_address_map Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 25/30] Genericize addrmap handling in the DWARF index writer Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 26/30] Adapt .gdb_index writer to new DWARF scanner Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 27/30] Adapt .debug_names " Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 28/30] Enable the new DWARF indexer Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 29/30] Delete DWARF psymtab code Tom Tromey
2021-08-26  2:19 ` [PATCH 30/30] Remove dwarf2_per_cu_data::v Tom Tromey
2021-08-26 20:32 ` [PATCH 00/30] Rewrite the DWARF "partial" reader Tom de Vries
2021-08-26 21:29   ` Tom Tromey
2021-08-27  7:31     ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2021-08-30 15:04       ` Tom Tromey
2021-09-06 19:46         ` Tom Tromey
2021-09-07 10:58           ` Tom de Vries
2021-09-07 12:16             ` Tom de Vries
2021-10-29 23:06               ` Tom Tromey
2021-09-09 19:00 ` Wei-min Pan
2021-09-11 21:08   ` Tom Tromey
2021-09-13 16:50     ` Weimin Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a41f7ce7-013a-c0cb-e57d-e8324409ecb3@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).