From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB113858294 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:50:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1EB113858294 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8162300089; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 01:50:51 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rewrite gdbarch registry Content-Language: en-US To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220610212657.1170222-1-tom@tromey.com> <87k07ng6bi.fsf@tromey.com> From: Tsukasa OI In-Reply-To: <87k07ng6bi.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 16:50:57 -0000 On 2022/08/05 4:24, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Tom> This series is based on the registry rewrite series. > Tom> While working on -Wshadow (which I think is probably a failure -- I'll > Tom> send a separate email), I noticed that gdbarch has its own registry > Tom> implementation. This series rewrites it to use the (rewritte) > Tom> registry.h instead. > > Tom> Regression tested (including using address sanitizer) on x86-64 > Tom> Fedora 34. > > I've also tested this with AddressSanitizer. > I'm going to check it in now. > > Tom I regret to inform you that a bug is found on {riscv64,x86_64}-unknown-elf. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29449 NOTE: NO NEED TO REVERT. If I have completed the copyright assignment, that was easy (I just requested the form recently). But I think fixing this bug is not hard. I think the information I posted is sufficient to make a patch. Best regards, Tsukasa