From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9FE3851C05 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 02:04:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7C9FE3851C05 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05E24ANb002646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:04:15 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 05E24ANb002646 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25BFE1E791; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:04:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB 10.1 release: branching early July? To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: andrew.burgess@embecosm.com, ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, tom@tromey.com References: <20200614015612.GA6242@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:04:09 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200614015612.GA6242@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Sun, 14 Jun 2020 02:04:10 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 02:04:23 -0000 On 2020-06-13 9:56 p.m., Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the GDB 9.2 release has been out for a few weeks, what > do you think about turning our attention to starting the GDB 10 > release cycle? I looked at the NEWS file, and there is a decent > number of new features. > > Based on that, what do you think of aiming for branching during > the weekend of July 4th? That's 3 weeks from now. We would then > be creating the first pre-release at the same time if possible, > and then try to aim for a release 2-3 weeks afterwards. That's fine with me. > Are there any changes that you think we should have in master > before we create the branch? > > This is what is current in the 10.1 list on Bugzilla: > > * [unassigned] > thread_info with duplicate ptid added to inferior thread list > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25412 > > Reported by Simon, who started investigating a bit. > Simon says the issue appeared after the "multi-target" patch > series went in (5b6d1e4fa by Pedro). > > Simon - is that still an issue? Yes, Pedro has a patch series to address it here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167578.html We need to get back to it and get it merged. Simon