From: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@volny.cz>
To: "Luis Machado" <luis.machado@arm.com>,
"Torbjörn SVENSSON" <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb/arm: PR 29738 Cache value for stack pointers for dwarf2 frames
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:27:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab86439a-d6cd-2d12-9380-2b13b3da3d7e@volny.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79392f32-a64e-7bcf-e4a3-b2795917580b@arm.com>
On 11/11/2022 10:15, Luis Machado wrote:
> Hi Torbjörn,
>
> On 11/4/22 14:44, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
>> Without this patch, the number of calls to arm_dwarf2_prev_register
>> would grow in a too rapid way when the number of frames increase.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> index c011b2aa973..a6fb660bcbc 100644
>> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> @@ -3992,78 +3992,6 @@ arm_dwarf2_prev_register (frame_info_ptr
>> this_frame, void **this_cache,
>> cpsr = reconstruct_t_bit (gdbarch, lr, cpsr);
>> return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, cpsr);
>> }
>> - else if (arm_is_alternative_sp_register (tdep, regnum))
>> - {
>> - /* Handle the alternative SP registers on Cortex-M. */
>> - bool override_with_sp_value = false;
>> - CORE_ADDR val;
>> -
>> - if (tdep->have_sec_ext)
>> - {
>> - CORE_ADDR sp
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
>> - CORE_ADDR msp_s
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum);
>> - CORE_ADDR msp_ns
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum);
>> - CORE_ADDR psp_s
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum);
>> - CORE_ADDR psp_ns
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum);
>> -
>> - bool is_msp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum)
>> - && (msp_s == sp || msp_ns == sp);
>> - bool is_msp_s = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum)
>> - && (msp_s == sp);
>> - bool is_msp_ns = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum)
>> - && (msp_ns == sp);
>> - bool is_psp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum)
>> - && (psp_s == sp || psp_ns == sp);
>> - bool is_psp_s = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum)
>> - && (psp_s == sp);
>> - bool is_psp_ns = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum)
>> - && (psp_ns == sp);
>> -
>> - override_with_sp_value = is_msp || is_msp_s || is_msp_ns
>> - || is_psp || is_psp_s || is_psp_ns;
>> -
>> - }
>> - else if (tdep->is_m)
>> - {
>> - CORE_ADDR sp
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
>> - CORE_ADDR msp
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum);
>> - CORE_ADDR psp
>> - = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> - tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum);
>> -
>> - bool is_msp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum) && (sp ==
>> msp);
>> - bool is_psp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum) && (sp ==
>> psp);
>> -
>> - override_with_sp_value = is_msp || is_psp;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (override_with_sp_value)
>> - {
>> - /* Use value of SP from previous frame. */
>> - frame_info_ptr prev_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
>> - if (prev_frame)
>> - val = get_frame_register_unsigned (prev_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
>> - else
>> - val = get_frame_base (this_frame);
>> - }
>> - else
>> - /* Use value for the register from previous frame. */
>> - val = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, regnum);
>> -
>> - return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, val);
>> - }
>> internal_error (_("Unexpected register %d"), regnum);
>> }
>> @@ -5202,9 +5130,72 @@ arm_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch
>> *gdbarch, int regnum,
>> reg->how = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_CFA;
>> else if (arm_is_alternative_sp_register (tdep, regnum))
>> {
>> - /* Handle the alternative SP registers on Cortex-M. */
>> - reg->how = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_FN;
>> - reg->loc.fn = arm_dwarf2_prev_register;
>> + /* Identify what stack pointers that are synced with sp. */
>> + bool override_with_sp_value = false;
>> +
>> + if (tdep->have_sec_ext)
>> + {
>> + CORE_ADDR sp
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
>> +
>> + CORE_ADDR msp_s
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum);
>> + CORE_ADDR msp_ns
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum);
>> + CORE_ADDR psp_s
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum);
>> + CORE_ADDR psp_ns
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum);
>> +
>> + bool is_msp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum)
>> + && (msp_s == sp || msp_ns == sp);
>> + bool is_msp_s = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_s_regnum)
>> + && (msp_s == sp);
>> + bool is_msp_ns = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_ns_regnum)
>> + && (msp_ns == sp);
>> + bool is_psp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum)
>> + && (psp_s == sp || psp_ns == sp);
>> + bool is_psp_s = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_s_regnum)
>> + && (psp_s == sp);
>> + bool is_psp_ns = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_ns_regnum)
>> + && (psp_ns == sp);
>> +
>> + override_with_sp_value = is_msp || is_msp_s || is_msp_ns
>> + || is_psp || is_psp_s || is_psp_ns;
>> +
>> + }
>> + else if (tdep->is_m)
>> + {
>> + CORE_ADDR sp
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
>> +
>> + CORE_ADDR msp
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum);
>> + CORE_ADDR psp
>> + = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
>> + tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum);
>> +
>> + bool is_msp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_msp_regnum) && (sp ==
>> msp);
>> + bool is_psp = (regnum == tdep->m_profile_psp_regnum) && (sp ==
>> psp);
>> +
>> + override_with_sp_value = is_msp || is_psp;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (override_with_sp_value)
>> + {
>> + /* Use the CFA value for this stack pointer register. */
>> + reg->how = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_CFA;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + /* This frame does not have any update for this stack
>> pointer. */
>> + reg->how = DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAME_VALUE;
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>
> Although it does make sense to cache the values to address this issue,
> I don't think this approach is appropriate.
>
> The init_reg () hook is supposed to initialize the rules. Even if
> unwinding works from this particular function, I don't think it is
> safe to do so.
>
> If we attempt to point at a register whose rule hasn't been initialize
> yet, we may run into issues. I'm not sure if that is technically
> possible, I haven't exercised this in practice.
>
> I think we need to take a step back and re-assess how we're
> determining the active sp register. From what I can tell, it is just a
> value check. Since we need to check at least 6 values, it gets fairly
> expensive the more frames you have in the debugging session.
>
> One idea that comes to mind is to introduce a pseudo-register that
> stores the active sp register number (say active_sp). It may not need
> a name if it is only going to be used for unwinding purposes.
>
> In the sentinel frame, we can easily determine this value by doing
> quick checks with all the alternate sp registers. The other frames
> would query this pseudo-register to know what value they must use for
> the alternate sp registers.
>
> I think this will reduce the number of alternate sp value fetches
> considerably, and thus will address this performance issue.
>
> For the alternate sp registers, we can still use the
> arm_dwarf2_prev_register function, but now we'll fetch the active_sp
> pseudo_register to help us decide what value to return.
>
> On other unwinders of different frame types (prologue, exception etc),
> we can adjust the value of active_sp accordingly if the active stack
> pointer changed.
>
> Does that make sense?
It makes a lot of sense to me.
Although I doubt if adding 'active_sp' is enough to prevent the rapid
growth of the number of fetches.
To resolve prev SP value the unwinder fetches 'active_sp' and the
specific xsp_x pointed by active_sp.
The prev frame needs active_sp again to find if the specific xsp_x is
updated to CFA and if not it fetches xsp_x.
And if we consider the evaluation of active_sp may be as expensive as
looking up secure gateway veneer name
and checking if prefixed by '__acle_se_' as used in
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-November/193433.html
I would incline to use better caching in the dwarf2 frames regardless of
using 'active_sp'.
My RFC patch series is sub-optimal from the performance point of view
and having handy 'active_sp' pseudo register available could make the
code simpler (and hopefully faster).
The bad news for me is that the change series would need almost a
complete rework (for the second time).
Please keep me informed.
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-11 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 14:44 [PATCH 0/3] gdb/arm: Fixes for Cortex-M stack unwinding Torbjörn SVENSSON
2022-11-04 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] gdb/arm: Update active msp/psp when switching stack Torbjörn SVENSSON
2022-11-04 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] gdb/arm: Ensure that stack pointers are in sync Torbjörn SVENSSON
2022-11-04 17:31 ` Tomas Vanek
2022-11-07 17:27 ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2022-11-04 14:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] gdb/arm: PR 29738 Cache value for stack pointers for dwarf2 frames Torbjörn SVENSSON
2022-11-11 9:15 ` Luis Machado
2022-11-11 10:27 ` Tomas Vanek [this message]
2022-11-12 19:54 ` Torbjorn SVENSSON
2022-11-14 10:46 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab86439a-d6cd-2d12-9380-2b13b3da3d7e@volny.cz \
--to=vanekt@volny.cz \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).