From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19547 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2012 21:30:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19505 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2012 21:30:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:30:36 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1S289S-0000hx-Uz from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:30:34 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:30:34 -0800 Received: from [172.30.12.164] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:30:32 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:37:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Mark Kettenis CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS/Linux: Update the number of pseudo registers too In-Reply-To: <201112081041.pB8AfTwo021983@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: References: <20111208083113.GH21915@adacore.com> <201112080858.pB88wBu2008282@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20111208090415.GJ21915@adacore.com> <201112081041.pB8AfTwo021983@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2 On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Similarly to the previous general MIPS change (pc_regnum and sp_regnum) > > > > > the Linux backend needs to update the number of pseudo registers as it > > > > > adds the "restart" register. No regressions in mips-linux-gnu testing > > > > > (native and remote). OK to apply? > > > > > > > > I don't understand this one. Isn't the register added to the list of > > > > normal registers, rather than pseudo registers? > > > > > > MIPS is a bit weird, since all register access is done via pseudo > > > registers to deal with 32-bit vs. 64-bit issues (in particular, > > > supporting a 32-bit ABI on 64-bit hardware). > > > > Aha, thanks! So that would indeed mean that Maciej's patch should be > > correct, right? > > Almost certainly, yes. Applied now, thanks for the review. Maciej