From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5172 invoked by alias); 20 May 2014 20:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5163 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2014 20:41:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 20:41:37 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Wmqqr-0001b1-BJ from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:41:33 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 20 May 2014 13:41:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 20 May 2014 21:41:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:41:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Andreas Arnez CC: Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1 In-Reply-To: <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <1400168975-3145-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 May 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: > >> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No > >> comments yet. [...] > > As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on > patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Apart from those I believe everything else > in this series was approved already. > > OK to push? I've finally got to regression-testing your MIPS change and it passed. I previously wrote already that the MIPS part looks good based on visual inspection so given that and the test results it is fine to go in. Apologies to have made you wait. Maciej